Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29489875›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

The ProQOL-21: A revised version of the Professional Quality of Life (ProQOL) scale based on Rasch analysis.

Brody Heritage, Clare S Rees, Desley G Hegney

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06626061 (Promotion of Mental Health and Prevention of Burnout Among Caregivers at CHU Grenoble Alpes), which is not on this map. Cited by 73 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
73citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06626061 naenrolling by invitationnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Promotion of Mental Health and Prevention of Burnout Among Caregivers at CHU Grenoble Alpes (CHUGA) and CH Métropole Savoie (CHMS) Through a Stress Management Intervention Based on Cognitive Behavioral Therapies.

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital, GrenobleRan2025 to 2026Enrolled240ConditionsBurnout, CaregiverArmsCognitive Behavioral Stress management in in person group Format, Cognitive Behavioral Stress management Hybrid Format
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

73 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Burnout among Professionals Working in Corrections: A Two Stage Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Australian neonatal nurses' professional quality of life: A descriptive cross-sectional study.Journal of child health care : for professionals working with children in the hospital and community · 2026
    Article
  7. Exploring the professional quality of life of South African audiologists.The South African journal of communication disorders = Die Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir Kommunikasieafwykings · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

13 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Brody HeritageSchool of Psychology and Exercise Science, Murdoch University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6437-7232
Clare S ReesSchool of Psychology, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Desley G HegneyResearch Division, Central Queensland University, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Professional Quality of Life scale is a measure intended to provide practitioners and researchers with an indication of a caring professional's compassion satisfaction, burnout, and secondary traumatic stress. While this measure has been used extensively in nursing research, owing to the relevancy of patient-care associated satisfaction and fatigue within this profession, information regarding the construct validity of this measure is less well represented in the literature. We examined the construct validity of the Professional Quality of Life scale using a Rasch analysis procedure on each of its three scales, as a means of substantiating their measurement adequacy. Responses on the Professional Quality of Life scale from 1615 registered nurses (age x̅ = 46.48 years, SD = 11.78) were analysed. While support for the measurement adequacy (invariance, person/item fit, and unidimensionality) of the compassion satisfaction scale was found, the burnout and secondary traumatic stress scales did not demonstrate adequate measurement properties. We instead present an alternative measurement model of these subscales, involving items from each, to form a robust measure of compassion fatigue, and provide recoding, scoring, and normed scores for both measures. Our findings indicate that use of the Professional Quality of Life scale's burnout and secondary traumatic stress scales may require caution, while our revised compassion satisfaction and fatigue scales provide robust measurement options for practitioners and researchers.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeAdultBurnout, ProfessionalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedModels, StatisticalNursesStress, Psychological

Identifiers

PMID29489875
PMCPMC5831102

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.