ArticlePloS one2018
Global migration of clinical research during the era of trial registration.
Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Industry-funded versus non-profit-funded critical care research: a meta-epidemiological overview.Intensive care medicine · 2018Pooled it
- Effectiveness of blended learning in pharmacy education: An experimental study using clinical research modules.PloS one · 2021Trial
- Implementation of the EU Clinical Trials Regulation and CTIS in Europe: a Comparative Regulatory Analysis (2013-2024).Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science · 2026Review
- Characteristics of Authorized Clinical Trials in Peru, 2017-2025: A National Registry-Based Study.Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science · 2026Article
- A longitudinal analysis of published clinical practice guidelines and their effect on disease burden.Nature communications · 2026Article
- The ClinicalTrials.gov Landscape of Multiple Myeloma Clinical Trials: A 20-Year Analysis of Geographic Distribution and Growth Patterns: USMIRC Analysis.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Article
- Barriers and Facilitators to Conducting Clinical Trials in Developing Countries: A Systematic Review.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2026Review
- Global challenges in diabetes research and care: which way forward? An appraisal from the EASD Global Council.Diabetologia · 2025Review
- A call to strengthen clinical trials capacity in resource-limited settings.BMJ global health · 2025Article
- Identifying and assessing the capacity and experience of trial sites in low- and middle-income countries for high-quality randomised drug trials in maternal and perinatal health.BMJ global health · 2025Article
- Global trends in clinical trials involving engineered biomaterials.Science advances · 2024Review
- Conducting Drug Treatment Trials in Children: Opportunities and Challenges.Pharmaceutical medicine · 2024Review
- Adaptive clinical trials in surgery: A scoping review of methodological and reporting quality.PloS one · 2024Article
- Clinical trials landscape in a lower-middle-income country (Pakistan).Journal of clinical and translational science · 2024Review
- Shared challenges to the control of complex intracellular neglected pathogens.Frontiers in public health · 2024Review
- Investigating the Secondary Use of Clinical Research Data: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study.JMIR research protocols · 2023Article
- Paving the way while playing catch up: mitochondrial genetics in African ancestry primary open-angle glaucoma.Frontiers in ophthalmology · 2023Article
- Open(ing) Access: Top Health Publication Availability to Researchers in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.Annals of global health · 2023Article
- Assessment of the COVID-19 vaccine market landscape in 2021 relative to challenges in low- and middle-income countries.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2022Article
- Descriptive Analysis of Good Clinical Practice Inspection Findings from U.S. Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency.Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSince the site of human subjects research has public health, regulatory, ethical, economic, and social implications, we sought to determine the global distribution and migration of clinical research using an open-access trial registry.
methodsWe obtained individual clinical trial data including location of trial sites, dates of operation, funding source (United States government, pharmaceutical industry, or organization), and clinical study phase (1, 1/2, 2, 2/3, or 3) from ClinicalTrials.gov. We used the World Bank's classification of each country's economic development status ["High Income and a Member of the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)", "High Income and Non-Member of the OECD", "Upper-Middle Income", "Lower-Middle Income", or "Low Income"] and United Nations Populations Division data for country-specific population estimates. We analyzed data from calendar year 2006 through 2012 by number of clinical trial sites, cumulative trial site-years, trial density (trial site-years/106 population), and annual growth rate (%) for each country, and by development category, funding source, and clinical study phase.
resultsOver a 7-year period, 89,647 clinical trials operated 784,585 trial sites in 175 countries, contributing 2,443,850 trial site-years. Among those, 652,200 trial sites (83%) were in 25 high-income OECD countries, while 37,195 sites (5%) were in 91 lower-middle or low-income countries. Trial density (trial site-years/106 population) was 540 in the United States, 202 among other high-income OECD countries (excluding the United States), 81 among high-income non-OECD countries, 41 among upper-middle income countries, 5 among lower-middle income countries, and 2 among low-income countries. Annual compound growth rate was positive (ranging from 0.8% among low-income countries to 14.7% among lower-middle income countries) among all economic groups, except the United States (-0.5%). Overall, 29,191 trials (33%) were funded by industry, 4,059 (5%) were funded by the United States government, and 56,397 (63%) were funded by organizations. Countries with emerging economies (low- and middle-income) operated 19% of phase 3 trial sites, as compared to only 6% of phase 1 trial sites.
conclusionHuman clinical research remains concentrated in high-income countries, but operational clinical trial sites, particularly for phase 3 trials, may be migrating to low- and middle-income countries with emerging economies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.