Observational studyMedicine2018
Real-time PCR assays for diagnosing brucellar spondylitis using formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues.
Observational study in Medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative analysis of pathogen detection methods in spinal infections: a retrospective study of 287 cases.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Sensitivity of current laboratory methods for brucellosis diagnosis at endemic foci.BMC microbiology · 2026Article
- Review
- Brucellosis: epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment-a comprehensive review.Annals of medicine · 2023Review
- Recurrent Arthritis Caused byInfection and drug resistance · 2022Article
- Beware ofInfection and drug resistance · 2022Article
- Microbiological Laboratory Diagnosis of Human Brucellosis: An Overview.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Optimization and validation of a real-time polymerase chain reaction protocol for the diagnosis of human brucellosis.Folia microbiologica · 2020Article
- ELISA is superior to bacterial culture and agglutination test in the diagnosis of brucellosis in an endemic area in China.BMC infectious diseases · 2020Article
- Laboratory Diagnosis of Human Brucellosis.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2019Review
- Hip osteoarticular complication due to delay in diagnosis and treatment of brucellar hip arthritis: two cases report.BMC infectious diseases · 2019Article
- Canine Brucellosis: Insights Into the Epidemiologic Situation in Europe.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
It is difficult to diagnose brucellar spondylitis because of its nonspecific clinical, radiological, and histological characteristics. This study aimed to determine whether real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues was superior to conventional serum-based methods for diagnosing brucellar spondylitis.This retrospective study included 31 patients with brucellosis and a control group of 20 people with no history of brucellosis or exposure to Brucella spp. Samples from all patients with brucellar spondylitis were evaluated using Giemsa staining, the standard tube agglutination (STA) test, blood culture, and real-time PCR.The brucellar spondylitis was acute in 7 patients (22.6%), subacute in 15 patients (48.4%), and chronic in 9 patients (29%). Serological assays provided positive results for 25 patients (80.1%), real-time PCR provided positive results for 29 patients (93.5%), and blood cultures provided positive results for 11 patients (35.5%). The real-time PCR provided sensitivity of 93.5%, specificity of 100%, a positive predictive value of 100%, and a negative predictive value of 100%. The corresponding values for the STA test were 80.1%, 100%, 100%, and 76.9%, respectively. Real-time PCR provided better sensitivity than Giemsa staining, the STA test, and blood culture, although the difference between PCR and STA was not statistically significant (P = .22). B melitensis was the only pathogen that was detected in patient with brucellar spondylitis using real-time PCR.These results suggest that real-time PCR provides a high sensitivity for diagnosing brucellar spondylitis. Furthermore, the real-time PCR results indicate that B melitensis was the causative pathogen in these cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.