Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29489632›Full record

ArticleNursing research

Temporal Immediacy: A Two-System Theory of Mind for Understanding and Changing Health Behaviors.

Paul F Cook, Sarah J Schmiege, Blaine Reeder, Sara Horton-Deutsch, Nancy K Lowe, Paula Meek

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Situational awareness predicts self-management of type I diabetes in adolescents and young adults.Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Paul F CookPaul F. Cook, PhD, is Associate Professor; Sarah J. Schmiege, PhD, is Associate Professor; Blaine Reeder, PhD, is Assistant Professor; Sara Horton-Deutsch, PhD, RN, PMHCNS, FAAN, ANEF, is Professor; Nancy K. Lowe, PhD, CNM, FACNM, FAAN, is Professor; and Paula Meek, PhD, RN, FAAN, is Professor, College of Nursing, University of Colorado, Aurora.
Sarah J Schmiege
Blaine Reeder
Sara Horton-Deutsch
Nancy K Lowe
Paula Meek

Funding

Explaining Individual Variability in Antiretroviral Adherence BehaviorR21NR012918 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI COOK, PAUL F. · 2012 to 2013
$413k
NINR NIH HHS R21 NR012918
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealth promotion and chronic disease management both require behavior change, but people find it hard to change behavior despite having good intentions. The problem arises because patients' narratives about experiences and intentions are filtered through memory and language. These narratives inaccurately reflect intuitive decision-making or actual behaviors.

objectivesWe propose a principle-temporal immediacy-as a moderator variable that explains which of two mental systems (narrative or intuitive) will be activated in any given situation. We reviewed multiple scientific areas to test temporal immediacy as an explanation for findings.

methodsIn an iterative process, we used evidence from philosophy, cognitive neuroscience, behavioral economics, symptom science, and ecological momentary assessment to develop our theoretical perspective. These perspectives each suggest two cognitive systems that differ in their level of temporal immediacy: an intuitive system that produces behavior in response to everyday states and a narrative system that interprets and explains these experiences after the fact.

findingsWriters from Plato onward describe two competing influences on behavior-often with moral overtones. People tend to identify with the language-based narrative system and blame unhelpful results on the less accessible intuitive system, but neither is completely rational, and the intuitive system has strengths based on speed and serial processing. The systems differ based on temporal immediacy-the description of an experience as either "now" or "usually"-with the intuitive system generating behaviors automatically in real time and the narrative system producing beliefs about the past or future. DISCUSSION: The principle of temporal immediacy is a tool to integrate nursing science with other disciplinary traditions and to improve research and practice. Interventions should build on each system's strengths, rather than treating the intuitive system as a barrier for the narrative system to overcome. Nursing researchers need to study the roles and effects of both systems.

Indexed as

Health BehaviorHealth PromotionTheory of MindCognitive NeuroscienceEconomics, BehavioralHumansNursing Theory

Identifiers

PMID29489632
PMCPMC8592031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.