Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29489468›Full record

ArticleEar and hearing

The Influence of Hearing Aid Gain on Gap-Detection Thresholds for Children and Adults With Hearing Loss.

Marc A Brennan, Ryan W McCreery, Emily Buss, Walt Jesteadt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ear and hearing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Marc A BrennanUniversity of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska, USA.
Ryan W McCreeryBoys Town National Research Hospital, Omaha, Nebraska, USA.
Emily BussUniversity of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Walt JesteadtBoys Town National Research Hospital, Omaha, Nebraska, USA.
Boys Town National Research Hospital · USUniversity of Nebraska–Lincoln · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

The Impact of Mild Hearing Loss on Auditory Perception in Complex EnvironmentsP20GM109023 · NIGMS · FATHER FLANAGAN'S BOYS' HOME · PI LEIBOLD, LORI J. · 2014 to 2023
$23.4M
Research Synergy CoreP30DC004662 · NIDCD · FATHER FLANAGAN'S BOYS' HOME · PI NEELY, STEPHEN T · 2001 to 2015
$5.9M
COMPLEX LISTENING SKILLS IN SCHOOL-AGE HARD OF HEARING CHILDRENR01DC013591 · NIDCD · FATHER FLANAGAN'S BOYS' HOME · PI MCCREERY, RYAN W. · 2014 to 2023
$4.8M
Optimizing Temporal Resolution and Speech Recognition with AmplificationF32DC012709 · NIDCD · FATHER FLANAGAN'S BOYS' HOME · PI BRENNAN, MARC A. · 2012 to 2013
$75k
NIDCD NIH HHS F32 DC012709NIDCD NIH HHS P30 DC004662NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC013591NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM109023
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe objective of this experiment was to examine the contributions of audibility to the ability to perceive a gap in noise for children and adults. Sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) in adulthood is associated with a deficit in gap detection. It is well known that reduced audibility in adult listeners with SNHL contributes to this deficit; however, it is unclear the extent to which hearing aid amplification can restore gap-detection thresholds, and the effect of childhood SNHL on gap-detection thresholds have not been described. For adults, it was hypothesized that restoring the dynamic range of hearing for listeners with SNHL would lead to approximately normal gap-detection thresholds. Children with normal hearing (NH) exhibit poorer gap-detection thresholds than adults. Because of their hearing loss, children with SNHL have less auditory experience than their peers with NH. Yet, it is unknown the extent to which auditory experience impacts their ability to perceive gaps in noise. Even with the provision of amplification, it was hypothesized that children with SNHL would show a deficit in gap detection, relative to their peers with normal hearing, because of reduced auditory experience.

designThe ability to detect a silent interval in noise was tested by adapting the stimulus level required for detection of gap durations between 3 and 20 ms for adults and children with and without SNHL. Stimulus-level thresholds were measured for participants with SNHL without amplification and with two prescriptive procedures-the adult and child versions of the desired sensation level i/o program-using a hearing aid simulator. The child version better restored the normal dynamic range than the adult version. Adults and children with NH were tested without amplification.

resultsWhen fitted using the procedure that best restored the dynamic range, adults with SNHL had stimulus-level thresholds similar to those of adults with normal hearing. Compared to the children with NH, the children with SNHL required a higher stimulus level to detect a 5-ms gap, despite having used the procedure that better restored the normal dynamic range of hearing. Otherwise, the two groups of children had similar stimulus-level thresholds.

conclusionThese findings suggest that apparent deficits in temporal resolution, as measured using stimulus-level thresholds for the detection of gaps, are dependent on age and audibility. These novel results indicate that childhood SNHL may impair temporal resolution as measured by stimulus-level thresholds for the detection of a gap in noise. This work has implications for understanding the effects of amplification on the ability to perceive temporal cues in speech.

Indexed as

Auditory PerceptionAuditory ThresholdHearing AidsAnalysis of VarianceChildHearingHearing Loss, SensorineuralHumansMiddle AgedReference Values

Identifiers

PMID29489468
PMCPMC6105512
OpenAlexW2793137505

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.