Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29489453›Full record

ArticleeLife2018

Opposite regulation of inhibition by adult-born granule cells during implicit versus explicit olfactory learning.

Nathalie Mandairon, Nicola Kuczewski, Florence Kermen, Jérémy Forest, Maellie Midroit, Marion Richard, Marc Thevenet, Joelle Sacquet, Christiane Linster, Anne Didier

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Noradrenergic Activity in the Olfactory Bulb Is a Key Element for the Stability of Olfactory Memory.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Plasticity in olfactory bulb circuits.Current opinion in neurobiology · 2020
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Nathalie MandaironLyon Neuroscience Research Center, Neuroplasticity and Neuropathology of Olfactory Perception Team, CNRS UMR 5292, INSERM U1028, Université de Lyon, Lyon, France.ORCID 0000-0001-7935-5215
Nicola KuczewskiLyon Neuroscience Research Center, Neuroplasticity and Neuropathology of Olfactory Perception Team, CNRS UMR 5292, INSERM U1028, Université de Lyon, Lyon, France.
Florence KermenLyon Neuroscience Research Center, Neuroplasticity and Neuropathology of Olfactory Perception Team, CNRS UMR 5292, INSERM U1028, Université de Lyon, Lyon, France.
Jérémy ForestLyon Neuroscience Research Center, Neuroplasticity and Neuropathology of Olfactory Perception Team, CNRS UMR 5292, INSERM U1028, Université de Lyon, Lyon, France.
Maellie MidroitLyon Neuroscience Research Center, Neuroplasticity and Neuropathology of Olfactory Perception Team, CNRS UMR 5292, INSERM U1028, Université de Lyon, Lyon, France.
Marion RichardLyon Neuroscience Research Center, Neuroplasticity and Neuropathology of Olfactory Perception Team, CNRS UMR 5292, INSERM U1028, Université de Lyon, Lyon, France.
Marc ThevenetLyon Neuroscience Research Center, Neuroplasticity and Neuropathology of Olfactory Perception Team, CNRS UMR 5292, INSERM U1028, Université de Lyon, Lyon, France.
Joelle SacquetLyon Neuroscience Research Center, Neuroplasticity and Neuropathology of Olfactory Perception Team, CNRS UMR 5292, INSERM U1028, Université de Lyon, Lyon, France.
Christiane LinsterComputational Physiology Lab, Cornell University, Ithaca, United States.
Anne DidierLyon Neuroscience Research Center, Neuroplasticity and Neuropathology of Olfactory Perception Team, CNRS UMR 5292, INSERM U1028, Université de Lyon, Lyon, France.ORCID 0000-0003-3118-9961

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Both passive exposure and active learning through reinforcement enhance fine sensory discrimination abilities. In the olfactory system, this enhancement is thought to occur partially through the integration of adult-born inhibitory interneurons resulting in a refinement of the representation of overlapping odorants. Here, we identify in mice a novel and unexpected dissociation between passive and active learning at the level of adult-born granule cells. Specifically, while both passive and active learning processes augment neurogenesis, adult-born cells differ in their morphology, functional coupling and thus their impact on olfactory bulb output. Morphological analysis, optogenetic stimulation of adult-born neurons and mitral cell recordings revealed that passive learning induces increased inhibitory action by adult-born neurons, probably resulting in more sparse and thus less overlapping odor representations. Conversely, after active learning inhibitory action is found to be diminished due to reduced connectivity. In this case, strengthened odor response might underlie enhanced discriminability.

Indexed as

LearningAnimalsBrainCellsCell ShapeMiceNeuronsOlfactory BulbOptogeneticsmouseneurogenesisneuroscienceolfactory bulbolfactory learningoptogenetics

Identifiers

PMID29489453
PMCPMC5829916

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.