Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29489407›Full record

ArticleAJR. American journal of roentgenology2018

CT Features of Ovarian Tumors: Defining Key Differences Between Serous Borderline Tumors and Low-Grade Serous Carcinomas.

Stephanie Nougaret, Yulia Lakhman, Nicolas Molinari, Diana Feier, Chiara Scelzo, Hebert A Vargas, Ramon E Sosa, Hedvig Hricak, Robert A Soslow, Rachel N Grisham and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AJR. American journal of roentgenology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Low-grade Serous Tumors: Are We Making Progress?Current oncology reports · 2020
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Stephanie Nougaret1 Service de Radiologie, Institut Régional du Cancer de Montpellier, 208 Avenue des Apothicaires, Montpellier, Herault 34298, France.
Yulia Lakhman2 Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Nicolas Molinari4 Department of Statistics, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montpellier, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Diana Feier2 Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Chiara Scelzo2 Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Hebert A Vargas2 Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Ramon E Sosa2 Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Hedvig Hricak2 Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Robert A Soslow7 Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Rachel N Grisham8 Department of Medicine, Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY.
Evis Sala2 Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USIuliu Hațieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy · ROUniversity of Rome Tor Vergata · IT

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe objective of our study was to investigate whether the CT features of serous borderline tumors (SBTs) differ from those of low-grade serous carcinomas (LGSCs) and to evaluate if mutation status is associated with distinct CT phenotypes. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis retrospective study included 59 women, 37 with SBT and 22 with LGSC, who underwent CT before primary surgical resection. Thirty of 59 patients were genetically profiled. Two radiologists (readers 1 and 2) independently and retrospectively reviewed CT examinations for qualitative features and quantified total tumor volumes (TTVs), solid tumor volumes (STVs), and solid proportion of ovarian masses. Univariate and multivariate associations of the CT features with histopathologic diagnoses and mutations were evaluated, and interreader agreement was determined.

resultsAt multivariate analysis, the presence of bilateral ovarian masses (p = 0.03), the presence of peritoneal disease (PD) (p = 0.002), and higher STV of ovarian masses (p = 0.002) were associated with LGSC. The presence of nodular PD pattern (p < 0.001 each reader) and the presence of PD calcifications (reader 1, p = 0.02; reader 2, p = 0.003) were associated with invasive peritoneal lesions (i.e., LGSC). The presence of bilateral ovarian masses (p = 0.04 each reader), PD (reader 1, p = 0.01; reader 2, p = 0.004), and higher STV (p = 0.03 for each reader) were associated with the absence of BRAF mutation (i.e., wild type [wt]-BRAF).

conclusionThe CT features of LGSCs were distinct from those of SBTs. The CT manifestations of LGSC and the wt-BRAF phenotype were similar.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBiomarkers, TumorCarcinomaContrast MediaFemaleHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalIohexolMiddle AgedMutationNeoplasm GradingOvarian NeoplasmsPhenotypePrecancerous ConditionsRetrospective StudiesBiomarkers, TumorContrast MediaIohexolBRAF mutationCTlow-grade serous ovarian carcinomaradiogenomicsserous borderline tumor

Identifiers

PMID29489407
PMCPMC6690180
OpenAlexW2788731649

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.