Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29489381›Full record

ArticleNano letters2018

A Direct Comparison of in Vitro and in Vivo Nucleic Acid Delivery Mediated by Hundreds of Nanoparticles Reveals a Weak Correlation.

Kalina Paunovska, Cory D Sago, Christopher M Monaco, William H Hudson, Marielena Gamboa Castro, Tobi G Rudoltz, Sujay Kalathoor, Daryll A Vanover, Philip J Santangelo, Rafi Ahmed and 2 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Nano letters, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 141 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
141citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

141 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Optimizing C14120-based LNPs forMolecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

81 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Kalina PaunovskaWallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering , Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University School of Medicine , Atlanta , Georgia 30332 , United States.
Cory D SagoWallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering , Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University School of Medicine , Atlanta , Georgia 30332 , United States.
Christopher M MonacoWallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering , Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University School of Medicine , Atlanta , Georgia 30332 , United States.
William H HudsonEmory Vaccine Center and Department of Microbiology and Immunology , Emory University School of Medicine , Atlanta , Georgia 30317 , United States.
Marielena Gamboa CastroWallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering , Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University School of Medicine , Atlanta , Georgia 30332 , United States.
Tobi G RudoltzWallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering , Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University School of Medicine , Atlanta , Georgia 30332 , United States.
Sujay KalathoorWallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering , Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University School of Medicine , Atlanta , Georgia 30332 , United States.
Daryll A VanoverWallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering , Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University School of Medicine , Atlanta , Georgia 30332 , United States.
Philip J SantangeloWallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering , Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University School of Medicine , Atlanta , Georgia 30332 , United States.
Rafi AhmedEmory Vaccine Center and Department of Microbiology and Immunology , Emory University School of Medicine , Atlanta , Georgia 30317 , United States.
Anton V BryksinParker H. Petit Institute for Bioengineering and Bioscience , Georgia Institute of Technology , Atlanta , Georgia 30332 , United States.
James E DahlmanWallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering , Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University School of Medicine , Atlanta , Georgia 30332 , United States.ORCID 0000-0001-7580-436X

Funding

Research Training Program Plan on Cell and Tissue Engineering (CTEng)T32GM008433 · NIGMS · GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI GARCIA, ANDRES J · 1991 to 2021
$7.1M
Graduate Training for Rationally Designed, Integrative Biomaterials - GT BioMATT32EB006343 · NIBIB · GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI TEMENOFF, JOHNNA S · 2008 to 2018
$2.2M
T32 Research Training Program in ImmunoEngineeringT32EB021962 · NIBIB · GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI JULIA E BABENSEE · 2017 to 2026
$1.9M
NIBIB NIH HHS T32 EB006343NIBIB NIH HHS T32 EB021962NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008433
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endothelial cells and macrophages play active roles in disease and as a result are important targets for nucleic acid therapies. While thousands of chemically distinct lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) can be synthesized to deliver nucleic acids, studying more than a few LNPs in vivo is challenging. As a result, it is difficult to understand how nanoparticles target these cells in vivo. Using high throughput LNP barcoding, we quantified how well LNPs delivered DNA barcodes to endothelial cells and macrophages in vitro, as well as endothelial cells and macrophages isolated from the lung, heart, and bone marrow in vivo. We focused on two fundamental questions in drug delivery. First, does in vitro LNP delivery predict in vivo LNP delivery? By comparing how 281 LNPs delivered barcodes to endothelial cells and macrophages in vitro and in vivo, we found in vitro delivery did not predict in vivo delivery. Second, does LNP delivery change within the microenvironment of a tissue? We quantified how 85 LNPs delivered barcodes to eight splenic cell populations, and found that cell types derived from myeloid progenitors tended to be targeted by similar LNPs, relative to cell types derived from lymphoid progenitors. These data demonstrate that barcoded LNPs can elucidate fundamental questions about in vivo nanoparticle delivery.

Indexed as

Drug Delivery SystemsAnimalsCell LineCells, CulturedEndothelial CellsFemaleHumansLipidsMacrophagesMiceMice, Inbred C57BLNanoparticlesNanotechnologyNucleic AcidsLipidsNucleic AcidsDNA barcoded nanoparticlesdrug deliverygene editingnanotechnologysiRNA

Identifiers

PMID29489381
PMCPMC6054134

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.