Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29489351›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical information and modeling2018

Development of a Reverse Phase HPLC Retention Index Model for Nontargeted Metabolomics Using Synthetic Compounds.

L Mark Hall, Dennis W Hill, Kelly Bugden, Shannon Cawley, Lowell H Hall, Ming-Hui Chen, David F Grant

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Deep metabolome: Applications of deep learning in metabolomics.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2020
    Review
  7. The application of artificial neural networks in metabolomics: a historical perspective.Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society · 2019
    Review
  8. Challenges in Identifying the Dark Molecules of Life.Annual review of analytical chemistry (Palo Alto, Calif.) · 2019
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

L Mark HallHall Associates Consulting , Quincy , Massachusetts 02170 , United States.
Dennis W HillDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences , University of Connecticut , Storrs , Connecticut 06269 , United States.
Kelly BugdenSouth Carolina Law Enforcement Division , Toxicology Department , Columbia , South Carolina 29210 , United States.
Shannon CawleyWillimantic , Connecticut 06226 , United States.
Lowell H HallDepartment of Chemistry , Eastern Nazarene College , Quincy , Massachusetts 02170 , United States.
Ming-Hui ChenDepartment of Statistics , University of Connecticut , Storrs , Connecticut 06269 , United States.
David F GrantDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences , University of Connecticut , Storrs , Connecticut 06269 , United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3616-6689

Funding

Metabolomics Tools for BiomedicineR01GM087714 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT STORRS · PI GRANT, DAVID FRANKLIN · 2010 to 2018
$3.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM087714
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The MolFind application has been developed as a nontargeted metabolomics chemometric tool to facilitate structure identification when HPLC biofluids analysis reveals a feature of interest. Here synthetic compounds are selected and measured to form the basis of a new, more accurate, HPLC retention index model for use with MolFind. We show that relatively inexpensive synthetic screening compounds with simple structures can be used to develop an artificial neural network model that is successful in making quality predictions for human metabolites. A total of 1955 compounds were obtained and measured for the model. A separate set of 202 human metabolites was used for independent validation. The new ANN model showed improved accuracy over previous models. The model, based on relatively simple compounds, was able to make quality predictions for complex compounds not similar to training data. Independent validation metabolites with feature combinations found in three or more training compounds were predicted with 97% sensitivity while metabolites with feature combinations found in less than three training compounds were predicted with >90% sensitivity. The study describes the method used to select synthetic compounds and new descriptors developed to encode the relationship between lipophilic molecular subgraphs and HPLC retention. Finally, we introduce the QRI (qualitative range of interest) modification of neural network backpropagation learning to generate models simultaneously based on quantitative and qualitative data.

Indexed as

Chromatography, High Pressure LiquidChromatography, Reverse-PhaseHumansMetabolomeMetabolomicsNeural Networks, Computer

Identifiers

PMID29489351
PMCPMC8404481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.