Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29489026›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2018

Application of seminal plasma to female genital tract prior to embryo transfer in assisted reproductive technology cycles (IVF, ICSI and frozen embryo transfer).

Baris Ata, Ahmed M Abou-Setta, Ayse Seyhan, William Buckett

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04880590 (Sex or no Sex), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04880590 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Sex or no Sex: That is the Question. Impact of Coital Sexual Intercourse on the Clinical Pregnancy Rate After Embryo Transfer.

TypeobservationalSponsorFundación Santiago Dexeus FontRan2021 to 2026Enrolled2,500ConditionsInfertility, Female, Sexual IntercourseArmsSex intercourse
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Assisted reproductive technology: an overview of Cochrane Reviews.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Seminal Plasma: Relevant for Fertility?International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Endometrial Immune Dysfunction in Recurrent Pregnancy Loss.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Baris AtaObstetrics and Gynecology, Koc University, Rumelifeneri yolu, Sarıyer, Istanbul, Turkey, 34450.
Ahmed M Abou-Setta
Ayse Seyhan
William Buckett
Amerikan Hastanesi · TRGeorge & Fay Yee Centre for Healthcare Innovation · CAKoç University · TRMcGill University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe female genital tract is not exposed to seminal plasma during standard assisted reproductive technology (ART) cycles. However, it is thought that the inflammatory reaction triggered by seminal plasma may be beneficial by inducing maternal tolerance to paternal antigens expressed by the products of conception, and may increase the chance of successful implantation and live birth.

objectivesTo assess the effectiveness and safety of application of seminal plasma to the female genital tract prior to embryo transfer in ART cycles. SEARCH

methodsWe searched the following databases from inception to October 2017: Cochrane Gynaecology and Fertility Group Specialised Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Central Register of Studies Online (CRSO), MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and PsycINFO. We also searched trial registers for ongoing trials, including International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) Search Portal and ClinicalTrials.gov. Other sources searched were; Web of Knowledge, OpenGrey, LILACS, PubMed, Google Scholar and the reference lists of relevant articles. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) conducted among women undergoing ART, comparing any procedure that would expose the female genital tract to seminal plasma during the period starting five days before embryo transfer and ending two days after it versus no seminal plasma application. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently selected trials, assessed risk of bias, and extracted data. We pooled data to calculate relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We assessed statistical heterogeneity using the I MAIN

resultsWe included 11 RCTs (3215 women). The quality of the evidence ranged from very low to low. The main limitations were risk of bias (associated with poor reporting of allocation concealment and other methods) and imprecision for the primary outcome of live birth rate.Live birth rates: There was insufficient evidence to determine whether there was a difference between the groups with respect to live birth rates (RR 1.10, 95% CI 0.86 to 1.43; participants = 948; studies = 3; I

Indexed as

Embryo TransferGenitalia, FemaleSemenAbortion, SpontaneousFemaleFertilization in VitroHumansLive BirthPregnancyPregnancy, EctopicPregnancy, MultiplePregnancy RatePublication BiasRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicReproductive Techniques, AssistedSperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic

Identifiers

PMID29489026
PMCPMC6491093
OpenAlexW1939371431

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.