ArticleJournal of cognitive neuroscience2018
Age-related Differences in Prestimulus Subsequent Memory Effects Assessed with Event-related Potentials.
Article in Journal of cognitive neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- The role of cognitive control affects memory encoding: evidence from subsequent memory paradigm.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Review
- Informative and uninformative prestimulus cues at encoding benefit familiarity and source memory.Memory (Hove, England) · 2023Article
- Age-related neural dedifferentiation for individual stimuli: an across-participant pattern similarity analysis.Neuropsychology, development, and cognition. Section B, Aging, neuropsychology and cognition · 2022Article
- Effects of Age on Prestimulus Neural Activity Predictive of Successful Memory Encoding: An fMRI Study.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2021Article
- Age differences in the neural correlates of the specificity of recollection: An event-related potential study.Neuropsychologia · 2020Article
- Pre-retrieval event-related potentials predict source memory during task switching.NeuroImage · 2019Article
- Prestimulus and poststimulus oscillatory activity predicts successful episodic encoding for both young and older adults.Neurobiology of aging · 2019Article
- The Relationship between Age, Neural Differentiation, and Memory Performance.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019Article
- Article
- Individual differences in cognitive performance under pain linked to region-specific alpha power modulations.Neurobiology of pain (Cambridge, Mass.)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Prestimulus subsequent memory effects (preSMEs)-differences in neural activity elicited by a task cue at encoding that are predictive of later memory performance-are thought to reflect differential engagement of preparatory processes that benefit episodic memory encoding. We investigated age differences in preSMEs indexed by differences in ERP amplitude just before the onset of a study item. Young and older adults incidentally encoded words for a subsequent memory test. Each study word was preceded by a task cue that signaled a judgment to perform on the word. Words were presented for either a short (300 msec) or long (1000 msec) duration with the aim of placing differential benefits on engaging preparatory processes initiated by the task cue. ERPs associated with subsequent successful and unsuccessful recollection, operationalized here by source memory accuracy, were estimated time-locked to the onset of the task cue. In a late time window (1000-2000 msec after onset of the cue), young adults demonstrated frontally distributed preSMEs for both the short and long study durations, albeit with opposite polarities in the two conditions. This finding suggests that preSMEs in young adults are sensitive to perceived task demands. Although older adults showed no evidence of preSMEs in the same late time window, significant preSMEs were observed in an earlier time window (500-1000 msec) that was invariant with study duration. These results are broadly consistent with the proposal that older adults differ from their younger counterparts in how they engage preparatory processes during memory encoding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.