Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29488850›Full record

ArticleJournal of cognitive neuroscience2018

Age-related Differences in Prestimulus Subsequent Memory Effects Assessed with Event-related Potentials.

Joshua D Koen, Erin D Horne, Nedra Hauck, Michael D Rugg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cognitive neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Age-related neural dedifferentiation for individual stimuli: an across-participant pattern similarity analysis.Neuropsychology, development, and cognition. Section B, Aging, neuropsychology and cognition · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The Relationship between Age, Neural Differentiation, and Memory Performance.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Joshua D KoenUniversity of Texas at Dallas.
Erin D HorneUniversity of Texas at Dallas.
Nedra HauckUniversity of Texas at Dallas.
Michael D RuggUniversity of Texas at Dallas.

Funding

Relationship Between Neural Correlates of Episodic Memory,Age, Memory PerformanceRF1AG039103 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS DALLAS · PI RUGG, MICHAEL D · 2017 to 2017
$2.7M
Relationship Between Neural Correlates of Episodic Memory,Age, Memory PerformancR01AG039103 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS DALLAS · PI RUGG, MICHAEL D · 2011 to 2015
$1.5M
Age-Related Differences in Episodic Memory EncodingF32AG049583 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS DALLAS · PI KOEN, JOSHUA · 2014 to 2016
$164k
NIA NIH HHS F32 AG049583NIA NIH HHS R01 AG039103NIA NIH HHS RF1 AG039103
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prestimulus subsequent memory effects (preSMEs)-differences in neural activity elicited by a task cue at encoding that are predictive of later memory performance-are thought to reflect differential engagement of preparatory processes that benefit episodic memory encoding. We investigated age differences in preSMEs indexed by differences in ERP amplitude just before the onset of a study item. Young and older adults incidentally encoded words for a subsequent memory test. Each study word was preceded by a task cue that signaled a judgment to perform on the word. Words were presented for either a short (300 msec) or long (1000 msec) duration with the aim of placing differential benefits on engaging preparatory processes initiated by the task cue. ERPs associated with subsequent successful and unsuccessful recollection, operationalized here by source memory accuracy, were estimated time-locked to the onset of the task cue. In a late time window (1000-2000 msec after onset of the cue), young adults demonstrated frontally distributed preSMEs for both the short and long study durations, albeit with opposite polarities in the two conditions. This finding suggests that preSMEs in young adults are sensitive to perceived task demands. Although older adults showed no evidence of preSMEs in the same late time window, significant preSMEs were observed in an earlier time window (500-1000 msec) that was invariant with study duration. These results are broadly consistent with the proposal that older adults differ from their younger counterparts in how they engage preparatory processes during memory encoding.

Indexed as

AgingEvoked PotentialsAdultBrainCuesElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansMaleMemoryNeuropsychological TestsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID29488850
PMCPMC5932257

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.