Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29488457›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene2018

Defining Diarrhea: A Population-Based Validation Study of Caregiver-Reported Stool Consistency in the Amhara Region of Ethiopia.

Kristen Aiemjoy, Solomon Aragie, Sintayehu Gebresillasie, Dionna M Fry, Adane Dagnew, Dagnachew Hailu, Melsew Chanyalew, Zerihun Tadesse, Aisha Stewart, Kelly Callahan and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Antidiarrheal Effect of 80% Methanol Extract and Fractions of the Leaves ofEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Kristen AiemjoyDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Solomon AragieThe Carter Center Ethiopia, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Sintayehu GebresillasieThe Carter Center Ethiopia, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Dionna M FryFrancis I. Proctor Foundation, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Adane DagnewThe Carter Center Ethiopia, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Dagnachew HailuThe Carter Center Ethiopia, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Melsew ChanyalewAmhara Regional Health Bureau, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia.
Zerihun TadesseThe Carter Center Ethiopia, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Aisha StewartThe Carter Center, Atlanta, Georgia.
Kelly CallahanThe Carter Center, Atlanta, Georgia.
Mathew FreemanRollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
John NeuhausDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Benjamin F ArnoldDivision of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California.
Jeremy D KeenanFrancis I. Proctor Foundation, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.

Funding

Sanitation, Water, and Instruction in face-washing for trachoma II (SWIFT II)UG1EY023939 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI KEENAN, JEREMY DAVID · 2019 to 2023
$4.1M
Sanitation, Water, and Instruction in Face-washing for TrachomaU10EY023939 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI KEENAN, JEREMY DAVID · 2014 to 2018
$2.7M
"Quantitative Bias Analysis to Adjust for Misclassification in a Cluster-Randomized Trial on Pediatric Diarrhea"F31HD088070 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI AIEMJOY, KRISTEN · 2017 to 2018
$63k
NEI NIH HHS U10 EY023939NEI NIH HHS UG1 EY023939NICHD NIH HHS F31 HD088070
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diarrhea is a leading cause of death among children aged less than five years globally. Most studies of pediatric diarrhea rely on caregiver-reported stool consistency and frequency to define the disease. Research on the validity of caregiver-reported diarrhea is sparse. We collected stool samples from 2,398 children participating in two clinical trials in the Amhara region of Ethiopia. The consistency of each stool sample was graded by the child's caregiver and two trained laboratory technicians according to an illustrated stool consistency scale. We assessed the reliability of graded stool consistency among the technicians, and then compared the caregiver's grade with the technician's grade. We also tested if the illustrated stool consistency scale could improve the validity of caregiver's report. The weighted kappa measuring the agreement between the two laboratory technicians reached 0.90 after 500 stool samples were graded. The sensitivity of caregiver-reported loose or watery stool was 15.5% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 9.7, 24.2) and the specificity was 98.4% (95% CI 97.1, 99.1). With the illustrated scale, the sensitivity was 68.5% (95% CI: 58.5, 77.1) and the specificity was 86.1% (95% CI: 79.3, 90.9). The results indicate that caregiver-reported stool consistency using the terms "loose or watery" does not accurately describe stool consistency as graded by trained laboratory technicians. Given the predominance of using caregiver-reported stool consistency to define diarrheal disease, the low sensitivity identified in this study suggests that the burden of diarrheal disease may be underestimated and intervention effects could be biased. The illustrated scale is a potential low-lost tool to improve the validity of caregiver-reported stool consistency.

Indexed as

AdultCaregiversChildChild, PreschoolDiarrheaFecesFemaleHumansInfantMaleReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID29488457
PMCPMC5928832

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.