Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29488231›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of clinical psychology2018

The measurement of cognitive reactivity to sad mood in patients remitted from major depressive disorder.

Caroline A Figueroa, Roel J T Mocking, Gelera A Mahmoud, Maarten W Koeter, Claudi L Bockting, Willem van der Does, Henricus G Ruhe, Aart H Schene

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of clinical psychology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Caroline A FigueroaDepartment of Psychiatry, Program for Mood Disorders, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0692-2244
Roel J T MockingDepartment of Psychiatry, Program for Mood Disorders, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Gelera A MahmoudDepartment of Psychiatry, Program for Mood Disorders, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Maarten W KoeterDepartment of Psychiatry, Program for Mood Disorders, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Claudi L BocktingDepartment of Psychology, University of Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Willem van der DoesDepartment of Psychology, Leiden University, The Netherlands.
Henricus G RuheDepartment of Psychiatry, Program for Mood Disorders, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Aart H ScheneDepartment of Psychiatry, Program for Mood Disorders, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NLLeiden University · NLUtrecht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesCognitive reactivity (CR) to sad mood is a risk factor for major depressive disorder (MDD). CR is usually measured by assessing change on the Dysfunctional Attitudes Scale (DAS-change) after sad mood-induction. It has, however, been suggested that the versions of the DAS (A/B) are not interchangeable, impacting the reliability and validity of the change score. The Leiden Index of Depression Sensitivity-Revised (LEIDS-R) is an alternative self-report measure of CR. Studies examining the relationship between LEIDS-R and DAS-change have shown mixed results. We examined whether scores of these CR measures differed between remitted MDD and controls, the relationship between these CR measures, and the effect of order of DAS administration on DAS-change.

designCross-sectional design with two groups (remitted MDD and controls).

methodsSixty-eight MDD patients remitted from ≥2 previous episodes, not taking antidepressants, and 43 never-depressed controls participated in a mood-induction and filled in the DAS-A/B in randomized order before and after mood-induction, and LEIDS-R separately.

resultsLEIDS-R scores and pre-mood-induction DAS scores were significantly higher in remitted MDD than controls (p < .001, Cohen's d = 1.48; p = .001, Cohen's d = 0.66, respectively). DAS-change did not differ between these groups (p = .67, Cohen's d = 0.08). LEIDS-R correlated with DAS-change (r = .30, p = .042), but only in the group that filled in DAS-B before DAS-A. In remitted MDD, DAS-change was dependent on the order of DAS versions before and after mood-induction (10.6 ± 19.0 vs. -1.2 ± 10.5, for order B-A and A-B, respectively), with a significant group × order interaction (p = .012).

conclusionsExisting DAS versions are not interchangeable, which compromises the usefulness of mood-inductions in clinical practice. The LEIDS-R seems a valid measure of cognitive vulnerability to depression. PRACTITIONER POINTS: Clinical implications: Cognitive reactivity (CR) is a risk factor of depressive recurrence. The current measurement of CR, by assessing change on the Dysfunctional Attitudes Scale (DAS) after mood-induction, is not reliable. The Leiden Index Depression Sensitivity-Revised (LEIDS-R) is an alternative CR measure. In contrast to mood-induction, it reliably assesses depression vulnerability. The use of mood-inductions for clinical/research purposes is unnecessary. LIMITATIONS OF THE STUDY: We were not able to examine the effect of previous treatment, which could have affected results as psychological treatments probably have differential effects on CR. Examining un-medicated patients may have led to selection of a sample not completely representative for the general MDD population. We did not administer both parallel versions of the DAS (A/B) before and after mood-induction. This might have provided better understanding of their differential sensitivity to change.

Indexed as

AffectCognitionCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMajor Depressive DisorderMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of Resultscognitioncognitive reactivitydepressionstressvulnerability

Identifiers

PMID29488231
PMCPMC6099317
OpenAlexW2793324813

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.