Trial reportInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2018
Precisely positioning the tip of an instrument inserted through an orifice with a free wrist robot: application to prostate biopsies.
Trial report in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Real Time Estimator to Perform Targeted Biopsies With a Free-Wrist Robot Despite Large Deformations of the Insertion Orifice.Frontiers in robotics and AI · 2021Article
- Design and experimental study of a novel 7-DOF manipulator for transrectal ultrasound probe.Science progressArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeRobots with a spherical unactuated wrist can be used for minimally invasive surgery. With such a robot, positioning the wrist center controls the instrument tip position when assuming that the insertion site behaves like a lever with a fixed and known fulcrum. In practice, this assumption is not always respected. In this paper we first study the practical consequences of this problem in terms of tip precision positioning. We then propose a robotic control scheme that improves the precision compared to the fixed point assumption approach.
methodsIn the first part of the paper, data recorded during robot-assisted transrectal needle positioning for prostate biopsies (nine patients) are exploited to quantify the positioning error induced by the use of a fixed point hypothesis in the positioning process. In the second part of the paper advanced control techniques allow for the online identification of a locally linear system that describes a model characterized by anisotropy and center displacement. A laboratory apparatus is used to demonstrate the resulting improvement on tip positioning precision.
resultsErrors obtained by processing the clinical data reach 7.5 mm at the tip in average. Errors obtained with the laboratory apparatus drop from 2.4 mm in average to 0.8 mm when using real-time model update.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29488147What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.