Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29488039›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical ecology2018

Identification of Floral Volatiles and Pollinator Responses in Kiwifruit Cultivars, Actinidia chinensis var. chinensis.

A M Twidle, D Barker, A G Seal, B Fedrizzi, D M Suckling

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical ecology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Olfactory Responses ofInsects · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Metabolites · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Frontiers in pharmacology · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

A M TwidleThe New Zealand Institute for Plant & Food Research Ltd, Canterbury Research Centre, Lincoln, 7608, New Zealand. andrew.twidle@plantandfood.co.nz.
D BarkerSchool of Chemical Sciences, University of Auckland, Private Bag, Auckland, 92019, New Zealand.
A G SealThe New Zealand Institute for Plant & Food Research Limited, 412 No. 1 Road, RD2, Te Puke, 3182, New Zealand.
B FedrizziSchool of Chemical Sciences, University of Auckland, Private Bag, Auckland, 92019, New Zealand.
D M SucklingThe New Zealand Institute for Plant & Food Research Ltd, Canterbury Research Centre, Lincoln, 7608, New Zealand.
Plant & Food Research · NZUniversity of Auckland · NZ

Funding

New Zealand Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment Contract#C11X1309
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Volatiles emitted from unpollinated in situ flowers were collected from two male cultivars, 'M33', 'M91', and one female cultivar 'Zesy002' (Gold3) of kiwifruit (Actinidia chinensis var. chinensis). The samples were found to contain 48 compounds across the three cultivars with terpenes and straight chain alkenes dominating the headspace. Electrophysiological responses of honey bees (Apis mellifera) and bumble bees (Bombus terrestris) to the headspace of the kiwifruit flowers were recorded. Honey bees consistently responded to 11 floral volatiles from Gold3 pistillate flowers while bumble bees consistently responded to only five compounds from the pistillate flowers. Nonanal, 2-phenylethanol, 4-oxoisophorone and (3E,6E)-α-farnesene from pistillate flowers elicited responses from both bee species. Overall, honey bees were more sensitive to the straight chain hydrocarbons of the kiwifruit flowers than the bumble bees, which represented one of the main differences between the responses of the two bee species. The floral volatiles from staminate flowers of the male cultivars 'M33' and 'M91' varied greatly from those of the pistillate flowers of the female cultivar Gold3, with most of the bee active compounds significantly different from those in the Gold3 flower headspace. The total floral emissions of 'M33' flowers were significantly less than those of the Gold3 flowers, while the total floral emissions of the 'M91' flowers were significantly greater than those of the Gold3 flowers.

Indexed as

ActinidiaAnimalsBeesBehavior, AnimalFlowersGas Chromatography-Mass SpectrometryPollinationVolatile Organic CompoundsVolatile Organic CompoundsApis melliferaBombus terrestrisElectroantennogramFloral volatilesKiwifruit

Identifiers

PMID29488039
OpenAlexW2790159143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.