Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29487949›Full record

ArticleDer Urologe. Ausg. A2018

[Watchful waiting and active surveillance of small renal masses].

R Mager, S Frees, A Haferkamp

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Der Urologe. Ausg. A, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

R MagerKlinik und Poliklinik für Urologie und Kinderurologie, Universitätsmedizin Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131, Mainz, Deutschland. rene.mager@unimedizin-mainz.de.
S FreesKlinik und Poliklinik für Urologie und Kinderurologie, Universitätsmedizin Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131, Mainz, Deutschland.
A HaferkampKlinik und Poliklinik für Urologie und Kinderurologie, Universitätsmedizin Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131, Mainz, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The incidence of small renal masses ≤4 cm is increasing due to the widespread use of cross-sectional imaging. The majority of these represent indolent forms, but the risk for developing metastases is reported in up to 6% of patients. Particularly in old and comorbid patients surgery might be harmful overtreatment. Thus, there is an increasing demand to establish oncologically safe active surveillance protocols. Radiographic or biopsy-based biological markers to appropriately designate candidates for active surveillance are currently the focus of research.

Indexed as

Watchful WaitingBiopsyComorbidityGermanyHumansIncidenceKidney NeoplasmsBiomarkersBiopsyMutationsNeoplasm metastasisRenal cell carcinoma

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.