Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29487882›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)2018

Virtual fluoroscopy for intraoperative C-arm positioning and radiation dose reduction.

Tharindu De Silva, Joshua Punnoose, Ali Uneri, Mahadevappa Mahesh, Joseph Goerres, Matthew Jacobson, Michael D Ketcha, Amir Manbachi, Sebastian Vogt, Gerhard Kleinszig and 4 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Robot-Assisted Reduction of the Ankle Joint via Multi-Body 3D-2D Image Registration.IEEE transactions on medical robotics and bionics · 2024
    Article
  5. Mixed Reality Interfaces for Achieving Desired Views with Robotic X-ray Systems.Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering. Imaging & visualization · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. State-of-the-art of lumbar puncture and its place in the journey of patients with Alzheimer's disease.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tharindu De SilvaJohns Hopkins University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Baltimore, Maryland, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2882-4920
Joshua PunnooseJohns Hopkins University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Baltimore, Maryland, United States.
Ali UneriJohns Hopkins University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Baltimore, Maryland, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3419-1805
Mahadevappa MaheshJohns Hopkins University, Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology, Baltimore, Maryland, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9370-3973
Joseph GoerresJohns Hopkins University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Baltimore, Maryland, United States.
Matthew JacobsonJohns Hopkins University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Baltimore, Maryland, United States.
Michael D KetchaJohns Hopkins University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Baltimore, Maryland, United States.
Amir ManbachiJohns Hopkins University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Baltimore, Maryland, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0206-5230
Sebastian VogtSiemens Healthineers, Erlangen, Germany.
Gerhard KleinszigSiemens Healthineers, Erlangen, Germany.
Akhil Jay KhannaJohns Hopkins University, Orthopaedic Surgery, Baltimore, Maryland, United States.
Jean-Paul WolinksyJohns Hopkins University, Department of Neurosurgery, Baltimore, Maryland, United States.
Jeffrey H SiewerdsenJohns Hopkins University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Baltimore, Maryland, United States.
Greg OsgoodJohns Hopkins University, Orthopaedic Surgery, Baltimore, Maryland, United States.
Johns Hopkins University · US

Funding

Intraoperative Imaging for Guidance, Patient Safety, and OR Quality AssuranceR01EB017226 · NIBIB · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI SIEWERDSEN, JEFFREY H · 2014 to 2017
$2.1M
Training In Orthopaedic Team ScienceT32AR067708 · NIAMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI JONES, LYNNE C., SHAFIQ, BABAR · 2015 to 2024
$2.0M
NIAMS NIH HHS T32 AR067708NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB017226
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Positioning of an intraoperative C-arm to achieve clear visualization of a particular anatomical feature often involves repeated fluoroscopic views, which cost time and radiation exposure to both the patient and surgical staff. A system for virtual fluoroscopy (called FluoroSim) that could dramatically reduce time- and dose-spent "fluoro-hunting" by leveraging preoperative computed tomography (CT), encoded readout of C-arm gantry position, and automatic 3D-2D image registration has been developed. The method is consistent with existing surgical workflow and does not require additional tracking equipment. Real-time virtual fluoroscopy was achieved via mechanical encoding of the C-arm motion, C-arm geometric calibration, and patient registration using a single radiograph. The accuracy, time, and radiation dose associated with C-arm positioning were measured for FluoroSim in comparison with conventional methods. Five radiology technologists were tasked with acquiring six standard pelvic views pertinent to sacro-illiac, anterior-inferior iliac spine, and superior-ramus screw placement in an anthropomorphic pelvis phantom using conventional and FluoroSim approaches. The positioning accuracy, exposure time, number of exposures, and total time for each trial were recorded, and radiation dose was characterized in terms of entrance skin dose and in-room scatter. The geometric accuracy of FluoroSim was measured to be [Formula: see text]. There was no significant difference ([Formula: see text]) observed in the accuracy or total elapsed time for C-arm positioning. However, the total fluoroscopy time required to achieve the desired view decreased by 4.1 s ([Formula: see text] for conventional, compared with [Formula: see text] for FluoroSim, [Formula: see text]), and the total number of exposures reduced by 4.0 ([Formula: see text] for conventional, compared with [Formula: see text] for FluoroSim, [Formula: see text]). These reductions amounted to a 50% to 78% decrease in patient entrance skin dose and a 55% to 70% reduction in in-room scatter. FluoroSim was found to reduce the radiation exposure required in C-arm positioning without diminishing positioning time or accuracy, providing a potentially valuable tool to assist technologists and surgeons.

Indexed as

3D–2D registrationdigitally reconstructed radiographsimage-guided surgeryorthopedic surgeryvirtual fluoroscopy

Identifiers

PMID29487882
PMCPMC5812884
OpenAlexW2793629061

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.