Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29487876›Full record

ArticleNeurophotonics2018

Designing a large field-of-view two-photon microscope using optical invariant analysis.

Jonathan R Bumstead, Jasmine J Park, Isaac A Rosen, Andrew W Kraft, Patrick W Wright, Matthew D Reisman, Daniel C Côté, Joseph P Culver

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurophotonics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 85 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Non-inertial scan angle multiplier for expanded fields-of-view.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. TWINKLE: An open-source two-photon microscope for teaching and research.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jonathan R BumsteadWashington University in Saint Louis, Department of Biomedical Engineering, St. Louis, Missouri, United States.
Jasmine J ParkWashington University School of Medicine, Department of Radiology, St. Louis, Missouri, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3991-5879
Isaac A RosenWashington University in Saint Louis, Department of Biology, St. Louis, Missouri, United States.
Andrew W KraftWashington University School of Medicine, Department of Neurology, St. Louis, Missouri, United States.
Patrick W WrightWashington University in Saint Louis, Department of Biomedical Engineering, St. Louis, Missouri, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2852-8988
Matthew D ReismanWashington University in Saint Louis, Department of Physics, St. Louis, Missouri, United States.
Daniel C CôtéUniversité Laval, Génie Physique et Optique, Département de Physique, Ville de Québec, Quebec, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6440-6948
Joseph P CulverWashington University in Saint Louis, Department of Biomedical Engineering, St. Louis, Missouri, United States.
Washington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

21ST CENTURY IMAGING SCIENCES: GRADUATE STUDENT TRAININGT32EB014855 · NIBIB · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI JOSEPH P CULVER, JOSEPH A O'SULLIVAN · 2012 to 2026
$3.1M
MAPPING FUNCTIONAL CONNECTIVITY WITH FLUORESCENCE MOLECULAR TOMOGRAPHYR01NS099429 · NINDS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI CULVER, JOSEPH P · 2017 to 2021
$2.9M
OPTICAL IMAGING AND FUNCTIONAL CONNECTIVITY MAPPING FOR MICER01NS078223 · NINDS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI CULVER, JOSEPH P · 2012 to 2016
$2.7M
NIBIB NIH HHS T32 EB014855NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS078223NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS099429
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conventional two-photon microscopy (TPM) is capable of imaging neural dynamics with subcellular resolution, but it is limited to a field-of-view (FOV) diameter [Formula: see text]. Although there has been recent progress in extending the FOV in TPM, a principled design approach for developing large FOV TPM (LF-TPM) with off-the-shelf components has yet to be established. Therefore, we present a design strategy that depends on analyzing the optical invariant of commercially available objectives, relay lenses, mirror scanners, and emission collection systems in isolation. Components are then selected to maximize the space-bandwidth product of the integrated microscope. In comparison with other LF-TPM systems, our strategy simplifies the sequence of design decisions and is applicable to extending the FOV in any microscope with an optical relay. The microscope we constructed with this design approach can image [Formula: see text] lateral and [Formula: see text] axial resolution over a 7-mm diameter FOV, which is a 100-fold increase in FOV compared with conventional TPM. As a demonstration of the potential that LF-TPM has on understanding the microarchitecture of the mouse brain across interhemispheric regions, we performed

Indexed as

etendueneurophysiologyoptical designoptical invariantscanning microscopytwo-photon microscopy

Identifiers

PMID29487876
PMCPMC5818100
OpenAlexW2788201177

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.