Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29487807›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of ophthalmology2018

miR-211 promotes lens epithelial cells apoptosis by targeting silent mating-type information regulation 2 homolog 1 in age-related cataracts.

Bo Lu, Ian T Christensen, Li-Wei Ma, Xin-Ling Wang, Ling-Feng Jiang, Chun-Xia Wang, Li Feng, Jin-Song Zhang, Qi-Chang Yan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of ophthalmology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A comprehensive investigation of identifying miRNA biomarkers and their potential role in age-related cataract by meta-analysis and bioinformatics analysis.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Bo LuDepartment of Ophthalmology, the Fourth Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Key Laboratory of Lens Research of Liaoning Province, Eye Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110005, Liaoning Province, China.
Ian T ChristensenUniversity of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah 84132, USA.
Li-Wei MaDepartment of Ophthalmology, the Fourth Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Key Laboratory of Lens Research of Liaoning Province, Eye Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110005, Liaoning Province, China.
Xin-Ling WangDepartment of Ophthalmology, the Fourth Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Key Laboratory of Lens Research of Liaoning Province, Eye Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110005, Liaoning Province, China.
Ling-Feng JiangDepartment of Ophthalmology, the Fourth Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Key Laboratory of Lens Research of Liaoning Province, Eye Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110005, Liaoning Province, China.
Chun-Xia WangDepartment of Ophthalmology, the Fourth Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Key Laboratory of Lens Research of Liaoning Province, Eye Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110005, Liaoning Province, China.
Li FengDepartment of Ophthalmology, the Fourth Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Key Laboratory of Lens Research of Liaoning Province, Eye Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110005, Liaoning Province, China.
Jin-Song ZhangDepartment of Ophthalmology, the Fourth Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Key Laboratory of Lens Research of Liaoning Province, Eye Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110005, Liaoning Province, China.
Qi-Chang YanDepartment of Ophthalmology, the Fourth Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Key Laboratory of Lens Research of Liaoning Province, Eye Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110005, Liaoning Province, China.
China Medical University · CNFourth Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University · CNUniversity of Utah · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo detect the expression of miR-211 in age-related cataract tissue, explore the effects of miR-211 on lens epithelial cell proliferation and apoptosis, and identify its target gene.

methodsThis study used real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) to measure the expression of miR-211 and its predicted target gene [silent mating-type information regulation 2 homolog 1 (SIRT1)] in 46 anterior lens capsules collected from age-related cataract patients. Human lens epithelial cell line (SRA01/04) cells were transfected with either miR-211 mimics, mimic controls, miR-211 inhibitors or inhibitor controls, 72h after transfection, miRNA and protein expression of SIRT1 were measured using RT-qPCR and Western blotting; then cells were exposed to 200 µmol/L H

resultsCompared to the control group, expression of miR-211 was significantly increased (

conclusionmiR-211 is highly expressed in the anterior lens capsules of patients with age-related cataracts. By negatively regulating the expression of SIRT1, miR-211 promotes lens epithelial cell apoptosis and inhibits lens epithelial cell proliferation.

Indexed as

apoptosiscataractmiR-211proliferationsilent mating-type information regulation 2 homolog 1

Identifiers

PMID29487807
PMCPMC5824072
OpenAlexW2793732222

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.