Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29487767›Full record

ReviewCureus2017

Ultrasound-based Techniques as Alternative Treatments for Chronic Wounds: A Comprehensive Review of Clinical Applications.

Saad Ahmed Alkahtani, Pramod S Kunwar, Mostafa Jalilifar, Samaneh Rashidi, Ali Yadollahpour

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07626203 (Enhancing Venous Ulcer Healing Via Hyaluronic Acid Phonophoresis), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07626203 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Enhancing Venous Ulcer Healing Via Hyaluronic Acid Phonophoresis: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorCairo UniversityRan2024 to 2025Enrolled64ConditionsVenous Ulcer, Venous Ulcer of LegArmsPhonophoresis group (A), Ultrasound-preceded gel (hyaluronic acid gel) group (B):
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Saad Ahmed AlkahtaniDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Najran University, Najran, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Pramod S KunwarDepartment of Pharmaceutics, Modern Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Indore, Madhya Pradesh 453111, India.
Mostafa JalilifarDepartment of Medical Physics, Faculty of Medicine, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran.
Samaneh RashidiDepartment of Medical Physics, School of Medicine, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran.
Ali YadollahpourDepartment of Medical Physics, School of Medicine, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ultrasound (US) waves have been recently developed for the treatment of different chronic wounds with promising therapeutic outcomes. However, the clinical efficacy of these techniques is still not fully understood and standard guidelines on dose ranges and possible side effects should be determined. This paper aims to comprehensively review the recent advances in US techniques for chronic wound treatment, their therapeutic efficacies, and clinical considerations and challenges. The databases of PubMed (1985-2017), EMBASE (1985-2017), Web of Sciences (1985-2017), Cochrane central library (1990-2017), and Google Scholar (1980-2017) were searched using the set terms. The obtained results were screened for the title and abstract by two authors and the relevant papers were reviewed for further details. Preclinical and clinical studies have shown strong evidence on the therapeutic efficiency of US in chronic wounds. The main limitation on developing clinical standard protocols of US for treatment of wounds is the lack of definite dose-response for each wound. However, spatial average temporal average is the main parameter for defining US dosage in wound treatment. The range of 0.5 to 3 W/cm

Indexed as

chronic woundclinical considerationsdosetherapeutic efficacyultrasound

Identifiers

PMID29487767
PMCPMC5814295

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.