ReviewJournal of atrial fibrillation2017
Reversal Agents in the Era of NOACs.
Review in Journal of atrial fibrillation, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Association between atrial fibrillation and gastrointestinal bleeding: pathophysiology, risk stratification, and management - a narrative review.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Review
- Intake of NOAC is associated with hematoma expansion of intracerebral hematomas after traumatic brain injury.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2021Article
- New oral anticoagulants - possible extension to other indications (Review).Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The incidence and prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF) is expected to more than double between 2010 and 2030. Accordingly, the use of non-vitamin K oral anticoagulant (NOAC) agents for thromboembolic stroke prevention is anticipated to increase. The development of effective and safe antidotes is needed to address the unmet need for rapid anticoagulation reversal. The immediate role for these novel antidotes is for reversal of NOAC activity in life threatening bleeding and urgent surgical intervention. In addition, reversal agents may play an important role in simplifying bridging protocols in the peri-procedural period for catheter ablation of AF and elective surgery. Currently, novel reversal agents are either decoy drug receptors or small molecule non-specific anticoagulant activity inhibitors. These agents are at various stages of FDA investigation and approval, with emerging prospective data for safety and efficacy. The purpose of this review is to outline the currently developed NOAC molecular antagonists, their potential clinical roles and future directions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.