Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29487608›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2018

Co-expression of P173S Mutant Rice

Dhirendra Fartyal, Aakrati Agarwal, Donald James, Bhabesh Borphukan, Babu Ram, Vijay Sheri, Renu Yadav, Mrinalini Manna, Panditi Varakumar, V Mohan M Achary and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Co-expression ofaBIOTECH · 2023
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Transgenic Cotton (Frontiers in plant science · 2020
    Article
  12. Sequencing the Plastid Genome of Giant Ragweed (Frontiers in plant science · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Dhirendra FartyalCrop Improvement Group, International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, New Delhi, India.
Aakrati AgarwalCrop Improvement Group, International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, New Delhi, India.
Donald JamesCrop Improvement Group, International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, New Delhi, India.
Bhabesh BorphukanCrop Improvement Group, International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, New Delhi, India.
Babu RamCrop Improvement Group, International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, New Delhi, India.
Vijay SheriCrop Improvement Group, International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, New Delhi, India.
Renu YadavCrop Improvement Group, International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, New Delhi, India.
Mrinalini MannaCrop Improvement Group, International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, New Delhi, India.
Panditi VarakumarCrop Improvement Group, International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, New Delhi, India.
V Mohan M AcharyCrop Improvement Group, International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, New Delhi, India.
Malireddy K ReddyCrop Improvement Group, International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, New Delhi, India.
International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology · INUttarakhand Technical University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Weeds and their devastating effects have been a great threat since the start of agriculture. They compete with crop plants in the field and negatively influence the crop yield quality and quantity along with survival of the plants. Glyphosate is an important broad-spectrum systemic herbicide which has been widely used to combat various weed problems since last two decades. It is very effective even at low concentrations, and possesses low environmental toxicity and soil residual activity. However, the residual concentration of glyphosate inside the plant has been of major concern as it severely affects the important metabolic pathways, and results in poor plant growth and grain yield. In this study, we compared the glyphosate tolerance efficiency of two different transgenic groups over expressing proline/173/serine (P173S) rice

Indexed as

EPSP synthaseglyphosateherbicide toleranceigrAweed control

Identifiers

PMID29487608
PMCPMC5816812
OpenAlexW2789923695

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.