Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29487401›Full record

ReviewMolecular psychiatry2019

Are immunotherapies for Huntington's disease a realistic option?

Hélèna L Denis, Florian Lauruol, Francesca Cicchetti

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular psychiatry, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Current and Possible Future Therapeutic Options for Huntington's Disease.Journal of central nervous system disease · 2022
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Applying Antibodies Inside Cells: Principles and Recent Advances in Neurobiology, Virology and Oncology.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2020
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hélèna L Denis *Centre de Recherche du CHU de Québec, Université Laval, Québec, QC, G1V 4G2, Canada.
Florian Lauruol *Centre de Recherche du CHU de Québec, Université Laval, Québec, QC, G1V 4G2, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5919-1372
Francesca CicchettiCentre de Recherche du CHU de Québec, Université Laval, Québec, QC, G1V 4G2, Canada. Francesca.Cicchetti@crchudequebec.ulaval.ca.
Université Laval · CA

Funding

CIHR MOP326050
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is compelling evidence that the pathophysiology of many neurodegenerative diseases includes dysregulation of the immune system, with some elements that precede disease onset. However, if these alterations are prominent, why have clinical trials targeting this system failed to translate into long-lasting meaningful benefits for patients? This review focuses on Huntington's disease, a genetic disorder marked by notable cerebral and peripheral inflammation. We summarize ongoing and completed clinical trials that have involved pharmacological approaches to inhibit various components of the immune system and their pre-clinical correlates. We then discuss new putative treatment strategies using more targeted immunotherapies such as vaccination and intrabodies and how these may offer new hope in the treatment of Huntington's disease as well as other neurodegenerative diseases.

Indexed as

HumansHuntington DiseaseImmunotherapy

Identifiers

PMID29487401
OpenAlexW2792557939

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.