Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29487365›Full record

ArticleNature ecology & evolution2018

Language continuity despite population replacement in Remote Oceania.

Cosimo Posth, Kathrin Nägele, Heidi Colleran, Frédérique Valentin, Stuart Bedford, Kaitip W Kami, Richard Shing, Hallie Buckley, Rebecca Kinaston, Mary Walworth and 19 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature ecology & evolution, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Kava consumption and the rise of sociopolitical complexity in Oceania.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Cultural evolution: Where we have been and where we are going (maybe).Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

29 authors.

Cosimo PosthDepartment of Archaeogenetics, Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, Jena, Germany. posth@shh.mpg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8206-3907
Kathrin NägeleDepartment of Archaeogenetics, Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, Jena, Germany.
Heidi ColleranDepartment of Linguistic and Cultural Evolution, Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, Jena, Germany. colleran@shh.mpg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2126-8116
Frédérique ValentinMaison de l'Archéologie et de l'Ethnologie, CNRS, UMR 7041, Nanterre, France.
Stuart BedfordDepartment of Linguistic and Cultural Evolution, Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, Jena, Germany.
Kaitip W KamiDepartment of Linguistic and Cultural Evolution, Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, Jena, Germany.
Richard ShingVanuatu Cultural Centre, Port-Vila, Vanuatu.
Hallie BuckleyDepartment of Anatomy, School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Rebecca KinastonDepartment of Archaeogenetics, Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, Jena, Germany.
Mary WalworthDepartment of Linguistic and Cultural Evolution, Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, Jena, Germany.
Geoffrey R ClarkArchaeology and Natural History, College of Asia and the Pacific, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
Christian ReepmeyerCollege of Arts, Society and Education, James Cook University, Cairns, Queensland, Australia.
James FlexnerDepartment of Archaeology, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Tamara MaricService de la Culture et du Patrimoine, Punaauia, Tahiti, French Polynesia.
Johannes MoserCommission for Archaeology of Non-European Cultures, German Archaeological Institute, Bonn, Germany.
Julia GreskyDepartment of Natural Sciences, German Archaeological Institute, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3493-2757
Lawrence KikoSolomon Islands National Museum, Honiara, Solomon Islands.
Kathryn J RobsonMRC Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK.
Kathryn AucklandWellcome Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Stephen J OppenheimerSchool of Anthropology and Museum Ethnography, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4838-7553
Adrian V S HillWellcome Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0900-9629
Alexander J MentzerWellcome Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4502-2209
Jana ZechDepartment of Archaeology, Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, Jena, Germany.
Fiona PetcheyWaikato Radiocarbon Dating Laboratory, The University of Waikato , Hamilton, New Zealand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3308-9983
Patrick RobertsDepartment of Archaeology, Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, Jena, Germany.
Choongwon JeongDepartment of Archaeogenetics, Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, Jena, Germany.
Russell D GrayDepartment of Linguistic and Cultural Evolution, Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, Jena, Germany.
Johannes KrauseDepartment of Archaeogenetics, Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, Jena, Germany. krause@shh.mpg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9144-3920
Adam PowellDepartment of Archaeogenetics, Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, Jena, Germany. powell@shh.mpg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2846-3790

Funding

European Research Council 758967
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent genomic analyses show that the earliest peoples reaching Remote Oceania-associated with Austronesian-speaking Lapita culture-were almost completely East Asian, without detectable Papuan ancestry. However, Papuan-related genetic ancestry is found across present-day Pacific populations, indicating that peoples from Near Oceania have played a significant, but largely unknown, ancestral role. Here, new genome-wide data from 19 ancient South Pacific individuals provide direct evidence of a so-far undescribed Papuan expansion into Remote Oceania starting ~2,500 yr BP, far earlier than previously estimated and supporting a model from historical linguistics. New genome-wide data from 27 contemporary ni-Vanuatu demonstrate a subsequent and almost complete replacement of Lapita-Austronesian by Near Oceanian ancestry. Despite this massive demographic change, incoming Papuan languages did not replace Austronesian languages. Population replacement with language continuity is extremely rare-if not unprecedented-in human history. Our analyses show that rather than one large-scale event, the process was incremental and complex, with repeated migrations and sex-biased admixture with peoples from the Bismarck Archipelago.

Indexed as

LanguagePopulation DynamicsDNA, AncientGenome, HumanHumansOceaniaDNA, Ancient

Identifiers

PMID29487365
PMCPMC5868730

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.