Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29487071›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2018

Disentangling the determinants of interest and willingness-to-pay for breast cancer susceptibility testing in the general population: a cross-sectional Web-based survey among women of Québec (Canada).

Jolyane Blouin-Bougie, Nabil Amara, Karine Bouchard, Jacques Simard, Michel Dorval

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. How is Value Defined in Molecular Testing in Cancer? A Scoping Review.Applied health economics and health policy · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Genetic Testing for Cancer Risk: Is the Community Willing to Pay for It?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jolyane Blouin-BougieDepartment of Management, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.
Nabil AmaraDepartment of Management, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.
Karine BouchardCentre des maladies du sein Deschênes-Fabia, Centre de recherche du CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Hôpital du Saint-Sacrement, Québec, QC, Canada.
Jacques SimardFaculty of Medicine, Centre de recherche du CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.
Michel DorvalFaculty of Pharmacy, Centre de recherche du CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Hôpital du Saint-Sacrement, Québec, QC, Canada.
Université Laval · CAHôpital du Saint-Sacrement · CA

Funding

CIHR CRN-8752-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo identify common and specific individual factors that favour or impede women's interest in and willingness-to-pay (WTP) for breast cancer susceptibility testing (BCST) and to identify the most impactful factors on both outcome measures. DESIGN AND

methodsThis study used a self-administered cross-sectional Web-based questionnaire that included hypothetical scenarios about the availability of a new genetic test for breast cancer.

participantsFrench-speaking women of the general population of Québec (Canada), aged between 35 and 69 years, were identified from a Web-based panel (2410 met the selection criteria, 1160 were reached and 1031 completed the survey). MEASURES: The outcomes are the level of interest in and the range of WTP for BCST. Three categories of individual factors identified in the literature were used as potential explanatory factors, that is, demographic, clinical and psychosocial.

resultsDescriptive statistics indicated that the vast majority of sampled women are interested in BCST (90%). Among those, more than half of them are willing-to-pay for such a test (57%). The regression models pointed out several factors associated with both outcomes (eg, age, income, family history, locus of control-powerful others) and marginal effects were used to highlight the most impactful factors for each outcome.

conclusionThe results of this study provide a proxy of the readiness of women of the general population to use and to pay for BCST. They also offer insights for developing inclusive and specific strategies to foster informed decision-making and guide the services offered by health organisations corresponding to women's preferences and needs.

Indexed as

Financing, PersonalInternetAdultAgedBreast NeoplasmsCross-Sectional StudiesEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansIncomeMiddle AgedQuebecSurveys and Questionnairesbreast cancer susceptibility testinginterestwillingness-to-paywomen of the general population

Identifiers

PMID29487071
PMCPMC5855474
OpenAlexW2794363584

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.