Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29486878›Full record

ReviewVeterinary journal (London, England : 1997)2018

African swine fever: A re-emerging viral disease threatening the global pig industry.

P J Sánchez-Cordón, M Montoya, A L Reis, L K Dixon

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Veterinary journal (London, England : 1997), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 269 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
269citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

269 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

209 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

P J Sánchez-CordónThe Pirbright Institute, Pirbright, Woking, Surrey GU24 0NF, UK.
M MontoyaThe Pirbright Institute, Pirbright, Woking, Surrey GU24 0NF, UK.
A L ReisThe Pirbright Institute, Pirbright, Woking, Surrey GU24 0NF, UK.
L K DixonThe Pirbright Institute, Pirbright, Woking, Surrey GU24 0NF, UK. Electronic address: linda.dixon@pirbright.ac.uk.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/I/00007031Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/I/00007037
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

African swine fever (ASF) recently has spread beyond sub-Saharan Africa to the Trans-Caucasus region, parts of the Russian Federation and Eastern Europe. In this new epidemiological scenario, the disease has similarities, but also important differences, compared to the situation in Africa, including the substantial involvement of wild boar. A better understanding of this new situation will enable better control and prevent further spread of disease. In this article, these different scenarios are compared, and recent information on the pathogenesis of ASF virus strains, the immune response to infection and prospects for developing vaccines is presented. Knowledge gaps and the prospects for future control are discussed.

Indexed as

Sus scrofaAfrican Swine FeverAfrican Swine Fever VirusAnimalsEurope, EasternGenotypeRussiaSwineViral VaccinesViral VaccinesAfrican swine feverControlEpidemiologyImmune responsesPathogenesisVaccination

Identifiers

PMID29486878
PMCPMC5844645

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.