Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29486799›Full record

ArticleJournal for immunotherapy of cancer2018

Radiation and PD-(L)1 treatment combinations: immune response and dose optimization via a predictive systems model.

Yuri Kosinsky, Simon J Dovedi, Kirill Peskov, Veronika Voronova, Lulu Chu, Helen Tomkinson, Nidal Al-Huniti, Donald R Stanski, Gabriel Helmlinger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal for immunotherapy of cancer, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. A Framework for Quantitative Systems Pharmacology Model Execution.Handbook of experimental pharmacology · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Assessing the performance of QSP models: biology as the driver for validation.Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics · 2024
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Yuri KosinskyM&S Decisions, Moscow, Russian Federation.
Simon J DovediOncology Research, MedImmune, Cambridge, UK.
Kirill PeskovM&S Decisions, Moscow, Russian Federation.
Veronika VoronovaM&S Decisions, Moscow, Russian Federation.
Lulu ChuEarly Clinical Development, IMED Biotech Unit, AstraZeneca, 35 Gatehouse Drive, Waltham, MA, 02451, USA.
Helen TomkinsonEarly Clinical Development, IMED Biotech Unit, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK.
Nidal Al-HunitiEarly Clinical Development, IMED Biotech Unit, AstraZeneca, 35 Gatehouse Drive, Waltham, MA, 02451, USA.
Donald R StanskiEarly Clinical Development, IMED Biotech Unit, AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD, USA.
Gabriel HelmlingerEarly Clinical Development, IMED Biotech Unit, AstraZeneca, 35 Gatehouse Drive, Waltham, MA, 02451, USA. gabriel.helmlinger@astrazeneca.com.ORCID 0000-0003-4925-2463

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNumerous oncology combination therapies involving modulators of the cancer immune cycle are being developed, yet quantitative simulation models predictive of outcome are lacking. We here present a model-based analysis of tumor size dynamics and immune markers, which integrates experimental data from multiple studies and provides a validated simulation framework predictive of biomarkers and anti-tumor response rates, for untested dosing sequences and schedules of combined radiation (RT) and anti PD-(L)1 therapies.

methodsA quantitative systems pharmacology model, which includes key elements of the cancer immunity cycle and the tumor microenvironment, tumor growth, as well as dose-exposure-target modulation features, was developed to reproduce experimental data of CT26 tumor size dynamics upon administration of RT and/or a pharmacological IO treatment such as an anti-PD-L1 agent. Variability in individual tumor size dynamics was taken into account using a mixed-effects model at the level of tumor-infiltrating T cell influx.

resultsThe model allowed for a detailed quantitative understanding of the synergistic kinetic effects underlying immune cell interactions as linked to tumor size modulation, under these treatments. The model showed that the ability of T cells to infiltrate tumor tissue is a primary determinant of variability in individual tumor size dynamics and tumor response. The model was further used as an in silico evaluation tool to quantitatively predict, prospectively, untested treatment combination schedules and sequences. We demonstrate that anti-PD-L1 administration prior to, or concurrently with RT reveal further synergistic effects, which, according to the model, may materialize due to more favorable dynamics between RT-induced immuno-modulation and reduced immuno-suppression of T cells through anti-PD-L1.

conclusionsThis study provides quantitative mechanistic explanations of the links between RT and anti-tumor immune responses, and describes how optimized combinations and schedules of immunomodulation and radiation may tip the immune balance in favor of the host, sufficiently to lead to tumor shrinkage or rejection.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalNeoplasmsAnimalsAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalB7-H1 AntigenCell Line, TumorDose-Response Relationship, DrugMice, Inbred BALB CRadiation DosageTumor BurdenAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalB7-H1 AntigenCd274 protein, mouseCancer immunity cycleCheckpoint inhibitorsCT26 tumorsDose sequencing and schedulingImmuno-activationImmuno-oncology (IO)Immuno-suppressionPD-1PD-L1Quantitative systems pharmacologyRadiation therapy

Identifiers

PMID29486799
PMCPMC5830328

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.