Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29486784›Full record

ArticleNutrition journal2018

Energy, nutrient and food content of snacks in French adults.

Wendy Si Hassen, Katia Castetbon, Christine Tichit, Sandrine Péneau, Anouar Nechba, Pauline Ducrot, Aurélie Lampuré, France Bellisle, Serge Hercberg, Caroline Méjean

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrition journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03335644 (The NutriNet-Santé Study. A Web-based Prospective Cohort Study of the Relationship Between Nutrition and Health and of Dietary Patterns and Nutritional Status Predictors), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03335644 recruitingnot on this map

The NutriNet-Santé Study. A Web-based Prospective Cohort Study of the Relationship Between Nutrition and Health and of Dietary Patterns and Nutritional Status Predictors

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of Paris 13Ran2009 to 2029Enrolled170,000ConditionsDiet, Food, and Nutrition, Exercise, Diseases Category, Cohort Studies
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Wendy Si HassenUniversité Paris 13, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Centre de Recherche en Epidémiologie et Statistique, Equipe de Recherche en Epidémiologie Nutritionnelle, Inserm (U1153), Inra (U1125), Cnam, 74 rue Marcel Cachin, F-93017, Bobigny, France. w.sihassen@eren.smbh.univ-paris13.fr.
Katia CastetbonUniversité Libre de Bruxelles, Ecole de Santé publique, Centre de Recherche en Epidémiologie, Biostatistique et Recherche Clinique, Route de Lennik 808 - CP 598, 1070, Brussels, Belgium.
Christine TichitInstitut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA) - UR 1303 Alimentation et Sciences Sociales ALISS, 65 boulevard de Brandebourg, F-94025, Ivry sur Seine, France.
Sandrine PéneauUniversité Paris 13, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Centre de Recherche en Epidémiologie et Statistique, Equipe de Recherche en Epidémiologie Nutritionnelle, Inserm (U1153), Inra (U1125), Cnam, 74 rue Marcel Cachin, F-93017, Bobigny, France.
Anouar NechbaUniversité Paris 13, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Centre de Recherche en Epidémiologie et Statistique, Equipe de Recherche en Epidémiologie Nutritionnelle, Inserm (U1153), Inra (U1125), Cnam, 74 rue Marcel Cachin, F-93017, Bobigny, France.
Pauline DucrotUniversité Paris 13, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Centre de Recherche en Epidémiologie et Statistique, Equipe de Recherche en Epidémiologie Nutritionnelle, Inserm (U1153), Inra (U1125), Cnam, 74 rue Marcel Cachin, F-93017, Bobigny, France.
Aurélie LampuréUniversité Paris 13, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Centre de Recherche en Epidémiologie et Statistique, Equipe de Recherche en Epidémiologie Nutritionnelle, Inserm (U1153), Inra (U1125), Cnam, 74 rue Marcel Cachin, F-93017, Bobigny, France.
France BellisleUniversité Paris 13, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Centre de Recherche en Epidémiologie et Statistique, Equipe de Recherche en Epidémiologie Nutritionnelle, Inserm (U1153), Inra (U1125), Cnam, 74 rue Marcel Cachin, F-93017, Bobigny, France.
Serge HercbergUniversité Paris 13, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Centre de Recherche en Epidémiologie et Statistique, Equipe de Recherche en Epidémiologie Nutritionnelle, Inserm (U1153), Inra (U1125), Cnam, 74 rue Marcel Cachin, F-93017, Bobigny, France.
Caroline MéjeanUniversité Paris 13, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Centre de Recherche en Epidémiologie et Statistique, Equipe de Recherche en Epidémiologie Nutritionnelle, Inserm (U1153), Inra (U1125), Cnam, 74 rue Marcel Cachin, F-93017, Bobigny, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSnacking raises concern since it may lead to an additional energy intake and poor nutrient quality. A snacking occasion can be defined as any eating occasion apart from main meals, regardless of the amount or type of foods consumed. We described the frequency of snacking occasions according to daily timing in French adults, and compared them between each other, and with the main meals, in terms of energy intake, energy and nutrient density, and food content.

methodsThis cross-sectional analysis included 104,265 adults from the NutriNet-Santé cohort. Food intake was estimated using 24-h records of weekdays. For each eating occasion, nutrient density and energy content and density were computed.

resultsAfter weighting, 47.6% of our sample were men and mean age was 45.6 (15.3). Overall, 68% of participants ate at least one snack during the reported record, mainly in the morning or afternoon. Overall snack had a lower nutrient density [22.8 (SD = 278.3)] than main meals [25.8 (36.9) to 30.0 (30.4)]; but higher energy density [222.2 (163.3) kcal/100 g] than meals [133.9 (57.3) to 175.9 (99.6) kcal/100 g]. Morning snack was the snacking occasion with the lowest energy density [211 kcal/100 g], the lowest energy intake [104.1 kcal] and the highest nutrient density [60.1]. Afternoon and evening snacks had the highest energy loads [192.4 kcal and 207.6 kcal], but low nutrient scores [16 and 13, respectively]. The main food groups contributing to energy intake from snacks were fatty-sweet and sugary foods, fruit, hot beverages, and bread.

conclusionsOur findings highlight the frequency of snacking and the varying nutritional quality of snacks over the day. The morning snack was shown to be healthier than afternoon and evening snacks.

trial registrationThis study was conducted according to guidelines laid down in the Declaration of Helsinki, and all procedures were approved by the Institutional Review Board of the French Institute for Health and Medical Research (IRB Inserm No. 0000388FWA00005831) and the French Data Protection Authority (Commission Nationale Informatique et Libertés No. 908450 and No. 909216). Electronic informed consent was obtained from all participants (Clinical Trial no. NCT03335644 ).

Indexed as

Energy IntakeNutritive ValueSnacksAdolescentAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFeeding BehaviorFemaleFranceHumansMaleMealsMiddle AgedNutrientsTime FactorsYoung AdultNutrientsEating occasionsEating patternsMealNutritional contentSnack

Identifiers

PMID29486784
PMCPMC5828417

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.