Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29486758›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2018

A stakeholder co-design approach for developing a community pharmacy service to enhance screening and management of atrial fibrillation.

Daniel Sabater-Hernández, Jacqueline Tudball, Caleb Ferguson, Lucía Franco-Trigo, Lutfun N Hossain, Shalom I Benrimoj

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Key stakeholder views on atrial fibrillation screening: a systematic mixed-studies review and interpretive analysis.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Delineating and clarifying the concept of self-care monitoring: a concept analysis.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2023
    Review
  9. Use of co-design methodology in the development of cardiovascular disease secondary prevention interventions: A scoping review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Opportunistic Screening for Atrial Fibrillation in the Pharmacies: A Population-Based Cross-Sectional Study.High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension · 2019
    Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Daniel Sabater-HernándezGraduate School of Health, University of Technology, Level 4, Building 7, 67 Thomas St, PO Box 123, Ultimo, Sydney, Australia. daniel.sabaterhernandez@uts.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0001-7419-8740
Jacqueline TudballGraduate School of Health, University of Technology, Level 4, Building 7, 67 Thomas St, PO Box 123, Ultimo, Sydney, Australia.
Caleb FergusonGraduate School of Health, University of Technology, Level 4, Building 7, 67 Thomas St, PO Box 123, Ultimo, Sydney, Australia.
Lucía Franco-TrigoGraduate School of Health, University of Technology, Level 4, Building 7, 67 Thomas St, PO Box 123, Ultimo, Sydney, Australia.
Lutfun N HossainGraduate School of Health, University of Technology, Level 4, Building 7, 67 Thomas St, PO Box 123, Ultimo, Sydney, Australia.
Shalom I BenrimojGraduate School of Health, University of Technology, Level 4, Building 7, 67 Thomas St, PO Box 123, Ultimo, Sydney, Australia.
University of Technology Sydney · AU

Funding

Covidien Pty Ltd UTS ID: PRO16-0688University of Technology Sydney 2013001605
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCommunity pharmacies provide a suitable setting to promote self-screening programs aimed at enhancing the early detection of atrial fibrillation (AF). Developing and implementing novel community pharmacy services (CPSs) is a complex and acknowledged challenge, which requires comprehensive planning and the participation of relevant stakeholders. Co-design processes are participatory research approaches that can enhance the development, evaluation and implementation of health services. The aim of this study was to co-design a pharmacist-led CPS aimed at enhancing self-monitoring/screening of AF.

methodsA 3-step co-design process was conducted using qualitative methods: (1) interviews and focus group with potential service users (n = 8) to identify key needs and concerns; (2) focus group with a mixed group of stakeholders (n = 8) to generate a preliminary model of the service; and (3) focus group with community pharmacy owners and managers (n = 4) to explore the feasibility and appropriateness of the model. Data were analysed qualitatively to identify themes and intersections between themes. The JeMa2 model to conceptualize pharmacy-based health programs was used to build a theoretical model of the service.

resultsStakeholders delineated: a clear target population (i.e., individuals ≥65 years old, with hypertension, with or without previous AF or stroke); the components of the service (i.e., patient education; self-monitoring at home; results evaluation, referral and follow-up); and a set of circumstances that may influence the implementation of the service (e.g., quality of the service, competency of the pharmacist, inter-professional relationships, etc.). A number of strategies were recommended to enable implementation (e.g.,. endorsement by leading cardiovascular organizations, appropriate communication methods and channels between the pharmacy and the general medical practice settings, etc.).

conclusionA novel and preliminary model of a CPS aimed at enhancing the management of AF was generated from this participatory process. This model can be used to inform decision making processes aimed at adopting and piloting of the service. It is expected the co-designed service has been adapted to suit existing needs of patients and current care practices, which, in turn, may increase the feasibility and acceptance of the service when it is implemented into a real setting.

Indexed as

PharmacistsSelf CareStakeholder ParticipationAgedAged, 80 and overAtrial FibrillationCommunity Pharmacy ServicesFemaleFocus GroupsHealth Services ResearchHumansMaleQualitative ResearchAtrial fibrillation [MeSH]Co-designCommunity pharmacy services [MeSH]Health planning [MeSH]Health services [MeSH]Self-monitoring

Identifiers

PMID29486758
PMCPMC6389098
OpenAlexW2800419541

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.