Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29486741›Full record

Trial reportBMC psychiatry2018

Intensive home treatment for patients in acute psychiatric crisis situations: a multicentre randomized controlled trial.

Jurgen Cornelis, Ansam Barakat, Jack Dekker, Tessy Schut, Sandra Berk, Hans Nusselder, Nikander Ruhl, Jeroen Zoeteman, Rien Van, Aartjan Beekman and 1 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC psychiatry, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Risk assessment for aggressive behaviour in schizophrenia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Economic evaluation of intensive home treatment in comparison to care as usual alongside a randomised controlled trial.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2025
    Trial
  4. From research to practice: Implementing an experimental home treatment model into routine mental health care.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2020
    Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jurgen CornelisDepartment of Research, Arkin Mental Health Care, Klaprozenweg 111, 1033, NN, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. jurgen.cornelis@ggzspa.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-7124-7727
Ansam BarakatDepartment of Research, Arkin Mental Health Care, Klaprozenweg 111, 1033, NN, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jack DekkerDepartment of Research, Arkin Mental Health Care, Klaprozenweg 111, 1033, NN, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Tessy SchutDepartment of Emergency Psychiatry, Arkin Mental Health Care, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Sandra BerkDepartment of Emergency Psychiatry, GGZ inGeest Mental Health Care, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Hans NusselderDepartment of Emergency Psychiatry, Arkin Mental Health Care, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Nikander RuhlDepartment of Emergency Psychiatry, GGZ inGeest Mental Health Care, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jeroen ZoetemanDepartment of Emergency Psychiatry, Arkin Mental Health Care, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Rien VanDepartment of Research, Arkin Mental Health Care, Klaprozenweg 111, 1033, NN, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Aartjan BeekmanGGZ inGeest and Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, VU University Medical Center, A.J. Ernststraat 1187, 1081, HL, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Matthijs BlankersDepartment of Research, Arkin Mental Health Care, Klaprozenweg 111, 1033, NN, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHospitalization is a common method to intensify care for patients experiencing a psychiatric crisis. A short-term, specialised, out-patient crisis intervention by a Crisis Resolution Team (CRT) in the Netherlands, called Intensive Home Treatment (IHT), is a viable intervention which may help reduce hospital admission days. However, research on the (cost-)effectiveness of alternatives to hospitalisation such as IHT are scarce. In the study presented in this protocol, IHT will be compared to care-as-usual (CAU) in a randomized controlled trial (RCT). CAU comprises low-intensity outpatient care and hospitalisation if necessary. In this RCT it is hypothesized that IHT will reduce inpatient days by 33% compared to CAU while safety and clinical outcomes will be non-inferior. Secondary hypotheses are that treatment satisfaction of patients and their relatives are expected to be higher in the IHT condition compared to CAU.

methodsA 2-centre, 2-arm Zelen double consent RCT will be employed. Participants will be recruited in the Amsterdam area, the Netherlands. Clinical assessments will be carried out at baseline and at 6, 26 and 52 weeks post treatment allocation. The primary outcome measure is the number of admission days. Secondary outcomes include psychological well-being, safety and patients' and their relatives' treatment satisfaction. Alongside this RCT an economic evaluation will be carried out to assess the cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of IHT compared to CAU. DISCUSSION: RCTs on the effectiveness of crisis treatment in psychiatry are scarce and including patients in studies performed in acute psychiatric crisis care is a challenge due to the ethical and practical hurdles. The Zelen design may offer a feasible opportunity to carry out such an RCT. If our study finds that IHT is a safe and cost-effective alternative for CAU it may help support a further decrease of in-patient bed days and may foster the widespread implementation of IHT by mental health care organisations internationally.

trial registrationThe trial is registered in the Netherlands Trial Register as # NTR-6151 . Registered 23 November 2016.

Indexed as

Home Care ServicesAcute DiseaseAmbulatory CareCost-Benefit AnalysisCrisis InterventionFemaleHospitalizationHumansMental DisordersMiddle AgedNetherlandsPsychotherapyTreatment OutcomeAdmission daysCommunity mental healthCost-effectivenessCrisis resolutionPsychiatric crisisRandomized controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID29486741
PMCPMC6389203

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.