Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29486559›Full record

ArticleThe journal of physical chemistry. B2018

Binding Modes of Ligands Using Enhanced Sampling (BLUES): Rapid Decorrelation of Ligand Binding Modes via Nonequilibrium Candidate Monte Carlo.

Samuel C Gill, Nathan M Lim, Patrick B Grinaway, Ariën S Rustenburg, Josh Fass, Gregory A Ross, John D Chodera, David L Mobley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of physical chemistry. B, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Benchmarking Docking Protocols on Predicting Alternative Binding Modes.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Core Flipping in Lead Optimization: Rank Ordering Using λ-Dynamics.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. ACES: Optimized Alchemically Enhanced Sampling.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. An overview of the SAMPL8 host-guest binding challenge.Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Samuel C GillDepartment of Chemistry , University of California , Irvine , California 92697, United States.
Nathan M LimDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences , University of California , Irvine , California 92697, United States.
Patrick B GrinawayGraduate Program in Physiology, Biophysics, and Systems Biology , Weill Cornell Medical College , New York , New York 10065 , United States.
Ariën S RustenburgGraduate Program in Physiology, Biophysics, and Systems Biology , Weill Cornell Medical College , New York , New York 10065 , United States.
Josh FassComputational and Systems Biology Program , Sloan Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center , New York , New York 10065 , United States.
Gregory A RossComputational and Systems Biology Program , Sloan Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center , New York , New York 10065 , United States.
John D ChoderaMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center , New York New York 10065 , United States.ORCID 0000-0003-0542-119X
David L MobleyDepartment of Chemistry , University of California , Irvine , California 92697, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-1083-5533

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Computational alchemy for molecular design and optimizationR01GM108889 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI MOBLEY, DAVID LOWELL · 2014 to 2022
$2.5M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM108889
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurately predicting protein-ligand binding affinities and binding modes is a major goal in computational chemistry, but even the prediction of ligand binding modes in proteins poses major challenges. Here, we focus on solving the binding mode prediction problem for rigid fragments. That is, we focus on computing the dominant placement, conformation, and orientations of a relatively rigid, fragment-like ligand in a receptor, and the populations of the multiple binding modes which may be relevant. This problem is important in its own right, but is even more timely given the recent success of alchemical free energy calculations. Alchemical calculations are increasingly used to predict binding free energies of ligands to receptors. However, the accuracy of these calculations is dependent on proper sampling of the relevant ligand binding modes. Unfortunately, ligand binding modes may often be uncertain, hard to predict, and/or slow to interconvert on simulation time scales, so proper sampling with current techniques can require prohibitively long simulations. We need new methods which dramatically improve sampling of ligand binding modes. Here, we develop and apply a nonequilibrium candidate Monte Carlo (NCMC) method to improve sampling of ligand binding modes. In this technique, the ligand is rotated and subsequently allowed to relax in its new position through alchemical perturbation before accepting or rejecting the rotation and relaxation as a nonequilibrium Monte Carlo move. When applied to a T4 lysozyme model binding system, this NCMC method shows over 2 orders of magnitude improvement in binding mode sampling efficiency compared to a brute force molecular dynamics simulation. This is a first step toward applying this methodology to pharmaceutically relevant binding of fragments and, eventually, drug-like molecules. We are making this approach available via our new Binding modes of ligands using enhanced sampling (BLUES) package which is freely available on GitHub.

Indexed as

LigandsBinding SitesMolecular Dynamics SimulationMonte Carlo MethodMuramidaseProtein BindingProtein Structure, TertiaryThermodynamicsTolueneWaterLigandsMuramidaseTolueneWater

Identifiers

PMID29486559
PMCPMC5980761

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.