ArticleJournal of managed care & specialty pharmacy2018
Use of Prescription Assistance Programs After the Affordable Health Care Act.
Article in Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Financial toxicity on treatment outcomes in head & neck cancer patients undergoing radiation therapy.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2025Article
- Factors Associated with Insured Children's Use of Physician Visits, Dentist Visits, Hospital Care, and Prescribed Medications in the United States: An Application of Behavioral Model of Health-Services Use.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024Article
- Characterizing Out-of-Pocket Payments and Financial Assistance for Patients Prescribed Abiraterone and Enzalutamide at an Academic Cancer Center Specialty Pharmacy.JCO oncology practice · 2022Article
- The Financial Effect of Medicare Coverage Design and Safety Net Options for Cancer Care.Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy · 2020Article
- Targeting Financial Toxicity in Oncology Specialty Pharmacy at a Large Tertiary Academic Medical Center.Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundInsurance coverage in the United States seems to be in a state of unrest. The 2010 passage of the Patient Protection and Affordable Health Care Act (ACA) extended health insurance coverage to roughly 32 million people. An increase in the number of people with health insurance benefits raised the question of whether prescription assistance programs (PAPs) would still be used after ACA implementation.
objectiveTo evaluate the use of PAPs following the implementation of the ACA insurance mandate.
methodsHealth insurance was not required by the ACA until January 2014, so we retrospectively examined the use of drug company-sponsored PAPs before and after the ACA implementation. Since each PAP had its own qualifying criteria, any person who used a PAP through the assistance of NeedyMeds and its PAPTracker between the years of 2011 and 2016 were included for analysis. Data were pulled by NeedyMeds from the PAPTracker software, which produces completed PAP applications from drug manufacturer forms for PAPs. The number of PAP orders, number of unique patient orders, and annual patient prescription savings were assessed.
resultsBetween 2011 and 2013, there was an average of 4.2 annual PAP orders per patient; however, annual PAP orders decreased to 3.1 per patient between 2014 and 2016 (P < 0.001). PAP orders declined by an average of 3.0% per month between 2014 and 2016 (P < 0.001), and average prescription savings per order increased from $870.40 before the ACA to $1,086.40 after ACA implementation (P = 0.0024). Patients saved an average of over $3,000 on prescriptions annually with the use of PAPs after the ACA mandate.
conclusionsAlthough health care reform is inevitable, our study showed that PAPs remain important to help cover prescription drug costs for eligible patients, even with invariable changes to health insurance, including a health insurance requirement. While the ACA may have been an important step forward in extending health insurance coverage to millions, PAPs are still used to help U.S. patients obtain their medications at no cost or very low cost. These programs will most likely remain relevant until other approaches are taken to help alleviate the effects of increasing drug prices in the United States. DISCLOSURES: No outside funding supported this research. The authors have no relevant financial or nonfinancial relationships to disclose. Study concept and design were contributed by Khan, Lerchenfeldt, and Karabon. Khan collected the data, and all authors participated in data analysis. The manuscript was primarily written by Lerchenfeldt, along with Khan and Karabon, and revised by Lerchenfeldt, along with Karabon and Khan.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.