Observational studyJournal of managed care & specialty pharmacy2018
Prospective Service Use and Health Care Costs of Medicaid Beneficiaries with Treatment-Resistant Depression.
Observational study in Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.
- Respiratory disease in people with major depressive disorder: A systematic review and Meta-analysis.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2025Pooled it
- Cost-effectiveness and threshold analysis of deep brain stimulation vs. treatment-as-usual for treatment-resistant depression.Translational psychiatry · 2024Pooled it
- The Effect of Muscular Strength on Depression Symptoms in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Pooled it
- Active Commuting and Depression Symptoms in Adults: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Pooled it
- Assessment of health-related quality of life and health status in patients with treatment-resistant depression treated with esketamine nasal spray plus an oral antidepressant.Health and quality of life outcomes · 2023Trial
- Humanistic outcomes in treatment resistant depression: a secondary analysis of the STAR*D study.BMC psychiatry · 2018Trial
- Profiles of Medicaid Beneficiaries with Treatment-Resistant Depression Initiated on Esketamine Nasal Spray.Neurology and therapy · 2025Article
- Psilocybin-assisted therapy for treatment-resistant depression in the US: a model-based cost-effectiveness analysis.Translational psychiatry · 2025Article
- Trajectories of pharmacological therapies for treatment-resistant depression: a longitudinal study.BMC psychiatry · 2025Article
- Article
- Ketamine for major depressive disorder during an inpatient psychiatric admission: Effectiveness, adverse events, and lessons learned.Journal of affective disorders · 2024Article
- Projecting the 10-year costs of care and mortality burden of depression until 2032: a Markov modelling study developed from real-world data.The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2024Article
- Pharmacogenomic profiling of the South Korean population: Insights and implications for personalized medicine.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Article
- Major challenges in youth psychopathology: treatment-resistant depression. A narrative review.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2024Review
- Treatment-resistant depression: definition, prevalence, detection, management, and investigational interventions.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2023Article
- Pramipexole Augmentation for Treatment-Resistant Unipolar and Bipolar Depression in the Real World: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Comorbidity and healthcare utilization in patients with treatment resistant depression: A large-scale retrospective cohort analysis using electronic health records.Journal of affective disorders · 2023Article
- Mortality-causing mechanisms and healthcare resource utilisation of treatment-resistant depression: A six-year population-based cohort study.The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2022Article
- Long-term Safety and Efficacy of Esketamine Nasal Spray Plus an Oral Antidepressant in Patients with Treatment-resistant Depression- an Asian Sub-group Analysis from the SUSTAIN-2 Study.Clinical psychopharmacology and neuroscience : the official scientific journal of the Korean College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2022Article
- Clinical research challenges posed by difficult-to-treat depression.Psychological medicine · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAlthough the clinical and health economic characteristics of commercially insured adults with treatment-resistant depression (TRD) have been well characterized, little is known about TRD in the Medicaid population.
objectiveTo describe clinical and health economic characteristics of adult Medicaid beneficiaries with TRD.
methodsRetrospective longitudinal cohort analyses were performed with Truven Health MarketScan Medicaid Database (2008-2014), focusing on adults with major depressive disorder (MDD) following an index antidepressant prescription. TRD was operationally defined as starting a third treatment regimen after 2 adequate regimens of antidepressants or augmentation therapy within 12 months of an index antidepressant prescription. Among patients with and without TRD, percentages with inpatient admissions, emergency department visits, and outpatient visits (all cause, mental health related, and depression related) were determined. Logistic regression models were used to examine associations between TRD status and use of inpatient, outpatient, and emergency services. Separate analyses were performed for the first and second year after the index antidepressant prescription.
resultsApproximately one quarter (25.9%) of pharmacologically treated adults with MDD met criteria for TRD. In relation to MDD patients without TRD, patients with TRD were proportionately more likely to be older, male, and white. Compared with MDD patients without TRD, patients with TRD were also significantly more likely to receive inpatient care for any cause (31.0% vs. 21.6%; P < 0.001), a mental health-related reason (12.7% vs. 7.6%; P < 0.001), or depression (10.1% vs. 6.1%; P < 0.001) during the first year following their index antidepressant prescription. Over the second follow-up year, patients with TRD continued to be more likely than patients without TRD to receive inpatient care for any reason (26.7% vs. 19.5%; P < 0.001), a mental health-related reason (5.6% vs. 2.7%; P < 0.001), and depression (3.7% vs. 1.7%; P < 0.001). The mean health care costs of patients with TRD were also significantly higher than the costs of patients without TRD during the first year ($18,982 [SD ± $35,276] vs. $11,642 [SD ± $29,203]) and second year ($17,997 [SD ± $34,146] vs. $10,325 [SD ± $28,224]) following the index antidepressant prescription.
conclusionsIn the U.S. Medicaid program, adults with TRD have substantially and persistently higher health care costs than their counterparts who do not meet criteria for TRD. The service use and health care cost patterns of patients with TRD in the Medicaid program highlight challenges of developing interventions and care coordination strategies to meet their complex clinical needs. DISCLOSURES: This project was sponsored by Janssen Scientific Affairs. Olfson received a grant from Janssen Scientific Affairs through Columbia University Medical Center. Amos and Benson are employees of Janssen Scientific Affairs. Marcus was paid by Janssen Scientific Affairs to provide consulting support for this study and reports fees from Sunovion Pharmaceuticals and Alkermes outside of this study. McRae was a fellow affiliated with Janssen Scientific Affairs during the development of this research and manuscript. Study concept and design were contributed by Amos, Olfson, Marcus, Benson, and McRae. Data analysis was performed by all the authors. The manuscript was primarily written by Olfson, along with the other authors, and revised by McRae, Benson, Amos, Marcus, and Olfson. A different data cut from the same database was presented previously at the 2017 Annual Meeting of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research; May 20-24, 2017; Boston, MA; and the 2017 AcademyHealth Annual Research Meeting; June 25-27, 2017; New Orleans, LA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.