Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29485677›Full record

ReviewClinical cardiology2018

Sex differences in heart failure.

Evann Eisenberg, Katherine E Di Palo, Ileana L Piña

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical cardiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05416879 (Lifestyle Behaviours of Women Newly Diagnosed With Heart Failure), which is not on this map. Cited by 59 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05416879 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Lifestyle Behaviours of Women Newly Diagnosed With Heart Failure: A Quantitative and Qualitative Approach

TypeobservationalSponsorNewcastle UniversityRan2022 to 2026Enrolled40ConditionsHeart FailureArmsActigraph GT3X+BT
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Evann EisenbergDepartment of Cardiology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, California, Los Angeles.
Katherine E Di PaloDepartment of Cardiology, Montefiore Medical Center, New York.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1558-4718
Ileana L PiñaAlbert Einstein College of Medicine, New York.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Heart failure (HF) numbers continue to grow in the United States and approximately 50% of patients living with HF are women. For the provider, it is critical to understand the role that gender plays in recognition, diagnosis, and management. The purpose of this literature review is to highlight the prevalence of heart failure in women and discuss gender variations in epidemiology, symptoms, pharmacology, and treatment as well as examine the representation of women in clinical trials.

Indexed as

FemaleGlobal HealthHeart FailureHumansMalePrevalenceRisk FactorsSex CharacteristicsSex FactorsStroke VolumeGender DifferencesHeart FailureWomen

Identifiers

PMID29485677
PMCPMC6489832

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.