Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29485676›Full record

Trial reportAlcoholism, clinical and experimental research2018

A Randomized Trial of a Personalized Feedback Intervention for Nonstudent Emerging Adult At-Risk Drinkers.

Cathy Lau-Barraco, Abby L Braitman, Amy L Stamates

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Health goals, sex, and college enrollment: Impacts on young adult response to digital alcohol intervention.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2026
    Trial
  2. Social network moderators of brief alcohol intervention impact.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2022
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Perceived Substance Use Norms Among Jailed Women with Alcohol Use Disorders.Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Cathy Lau-BarracoDepartment of Psychology, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, Virginia.ORCID 0000-0002-2072-5477
Abby L BraitmanDepartment of Psychology, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, Virginia.ORCID 0000-0003-2259-1094
Amy L StamatesDepartment of Psychology, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, Virginia.

Funding

REFINING BOOSTERS TO STRENGTHEN ONLINE COLLEGE STUDENT DRINKING INTERVENTIONSK01AA023849 · NIAAA · OLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY · PI BRAITMAN, ABBY L. · 2016 to 2021
$856k
Adapting a Secondary Prevention Program for Nonstudent Emerging Adult DrinkersK01AA018383 · NIAAA · OLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY · PI LAU-BARRACO, CATHY · 2010 to 2014
$703k
NIAAA NIH HHS K01 AA018383NIAAA NIH HHS K01 AA023849
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEmerging adulthood is a period of heightened vulnerability for problematic alcohol use. Considerable research has been devoted to reducing alcohol risks in college student populations, although far less effort has focused on their noncollege-attending peers. Research targeting nonstudent emerging adults is critical as this group is at risk of experiencing alcohol-related harms. Consequently, the main objective of the present randomized study was to examine the preliminary efficacy of a brief personalized feedback intervention (PFI) tailored for nonstudent at-risk drinkers. We also examined the influence of gender on intervention outcomes. Finally, we explored participant acceptability of the intervention.

methodsParticipants were 164 (65.9% men) emerging adults (M age = 21.98, SD = 2.02) recruited from the community. They were randomly assigned to either a 50-minute, in-person PFI or an assessment-only control group and were assessed over 9 months postintervention.

resultsResults showed that for short-term change (1 month), the PFI condition reduced drinking significantly more than controls. For longer-term change (1 to 9 months), both conditions continued to show gradual decline in consumption. The groups did not differ in alcohol-related problems, and the intervention was equally effective for both women and men. Regarding acceptability, participants were extremely satisfied with the intervention, perceived the information to be personally relevant, and thought it provided them a new way of looking at their own drinking.

conclusionsOverall, the present research advanced knowledge regarding an understudied and at-risk group of drinkers. This is among one of the first randomized studies to evaluate a brief intervention tailored to the needs of nonstudent emerging adults based on prior formative research with this group. Our data support PFI as a promising intervention approach for nonstudent drinkers in the community. Ultimately, this line of research aims to reduce alcohol-related health disparities associated with inequities in education.

Indexed as

Formative FeedbackAdultAlcohol-Related DisordersConsumer BehaviorEducational StatusFemaleHumansMaleSex FactorsTime FactorsYoung AdultAlcoholAlcohol-Related ProblemsBrief Alcohol InterventionEmerging AdultsNonstudentsPersonalized Feedback

Identifiers

PMID29485676
PMCPMC5880707

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.