Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29485404›Full record

ArticleeLife2018

Frontal cortex selects representations of the talker's mouth to aid in speech perception.

Muge Ozker, Daniel Yoshor, Michael S Beauchamp

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Neurophysiological Indices of Audiovisual Speech Processing Reveal a Hierarchy of Multisensory Integration Effects.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  7. Crossmodal Phase Reset and Evoked Responses Provide Complementary Mechanisms for the Influence of Visual Speech in Auditory Cortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  8. Responses to Visual Speech in Human Posterior Superior Temporal Gyrus Examined with iEEG Deconvolution.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Muge OzkerDepartment of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Texas, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-7472-4528
Daniel YoshorDepartment of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Texas, United States.
Michael S BeauchampDepartment of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Texas, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-7599-9934

Funding

NEURAL SUBSTRATES OF OPTIMAL MULTISENSORY INTEGRATIONR01NS065395 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI Michael S Beauchamp · 2010 to 2026
$5.5M
Dynamic Neural Mechanisms of Audiovisual Speech PerceptionU01NS098976 · NINDS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI SCHROEDER, CHARLES E · 2016 to 2018
$3.0M
Mechanism of Rapid Object Recognition in Human Ventral Temporal CortexI01CX000325 · VA · MICHAEL E DEBAKEY VA MEDICAL CENTER · PI YOSHOR, DANIEL · 2011 to 2013
–
Multisensory Processing of Human Speech Measured with msec and mm ResolutionI01CX001122 · VA · MICHAEL E DEBAKEY VA MEDICAL CENTER · PI SHETH, SAMEER ANIL · 2015 to 2022
–
CSRD VA I01 CX001122CSRD VA Merit Award Number 1I01CX000325NIH HHS R01NS065395NIH HHS U01NS098976NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS065395NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS098976
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human faces contain multiple sources of information. During speech perception, visual information from the talker's mouth is integrated with auditory information from the talker's voice. By directly recording neural responses from small populations of neurons in patients implanted with subdural electrodes, we found enhanced visual cortex responses to speech when auditory speech was absent (rendering visual speech especially relevant). Receptive field mapping demonstrated that this enhancement was specific to regions of the visual cortex with retinotopic representations of the mouth of the talker. Connectivity between frontal cortex and other brain regions was measured with trial-by-trial power correlations. Strong connectivity was observed between frontal cortex and mouth regions of visual cortex; connectivity was weaker between frontal cortex and non-mouth regions of visual cortex or auditory cortex. These results suggest that top-down selection of visual information from the talker's mouth by frontal cortex plays an important role in audiovisual speech perception.

Indexed as

MouthSpeech PerceptionVisual PerceptionAdultBrain MappingConnectomeElectroencephalographyFemaleFrontal LobeHumansMaleaudiovisual speech perceptionelectrocorticographyfrontal cortexhumanneurosciencevisual cortex

Identifiers

PMID29485404
PMCPMC5828660

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.