Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29485103›Full record

ArticleJournal of neural engineering2018

Evaluating the in vivo glial response to miniaturized parylene cortical probes coated with an ultra-fast degrading polymer to aid insertion.

Meng-Chen Lo, Shuwu Wang, Sagar Singh, Vinod B Damodaran, Ijaz Ahmed, Kevin Coffey, David Barker, Kshitij Saste, Karanvir Kals, Hilton M Kaplan and 3 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · greenAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neural engineering, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. The Future of Neuroscience: Flexible and Wireless Implantable Neural Electronics.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2021
    Review
  8. Fabrication of a Multilayer Implantable Cortical Microelectrode Probe to Improve Recording Potential.Journal of microelectromechanical systems : a joint IEEE and ASME publication on microstructures, microactuators, microsensors, and microsystems · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Meng-Chen LoDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-3913-3233
Shuwu WangNew Jersey Center for Biomaterials, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ, United States of America.
Sagar SinghDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ, United States of America.
Vinod B DamodaranNew Jersey Center for Biomaterials, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ, United States of America.
Ijaz AhmedDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ, United States of America.
Kevin CoffeyDepartment of Psychology, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ, United States of America.
David BarkerDepartment of Psychology, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ, United States of America.
Kshitij SasteNew Jersey Center for Biomaterials, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ, United States of America.
Karanvir KalsNew Jersey Center for Biomaterials, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ, United States of America.
Hilton M KaplanNew Jersey Center for Biomaterials, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ, United States of America.
Joachim KohnNew Jersey Center for Biomaterials, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ, United States of America.
David I ShreiberDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-8248-419X
Jeffrey D ZahnDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-8712-752X
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey · US

Funding

NIDA NIH HHS K99 DA043572
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveDespite the feasibility of short-term neural recordings using implantable microelectrodes, attaining reliable, chronic recordings remains a challenge. Most neural recording devices suffer from a long-term tissue response, including gliosis, at the device-tissue interface. It was hypothesized that smaller, more flexible intracortical probes would limit gliosis by providing a better mechanical match with surrounding tissue. APPROACH: This paper describes the in vivo evaluation of flexible parylene microprobes designed to improve the interface with the adjacent neural tissue to limit gliosis and thereby allow for improved recording longevity. The probes were coated with an ultrafast degrading tyrosine-derived polycarbonate (E5005(2K)) polymer that provides temporary mechanical support for device implantation, yet degrades within 2 h post-implantation. A parametric study of probes of varying dimensions and polymer coating thicknesses were implanted in rat brains. The glial tissue response and neuronal loss were assessed from 72 h to 24 weeks post-implantation via immunohistochemistry. MAIN

resultsExperimental results suggest that both probe and polymer coating sizes affect the extent of gliosis. When an appropriate sized coating dimension (100 µm  ×  100 µm) and small probe (30 µm  ×  5 µm) was implanted, a minimal post-implantation glial response was observed. No discernible gliosis was detected when compared to tissue where a sham control consisting of a solid degradable polymer shuttle of the same dimensions was inserted. A larger polymer coating (200 µm  ×  200 µm) device induced a more severe glial response at later time points, suggesting that the initial insertion trauma can affect gliosis even when the polymer shuttle degrades rapidly. A larger degree of gliosis was also observed when comparing a larger sized probe (80 µm  ×  5 µm) to a smaller probe (30 µm  ×  5 µm) using the same polymer coating size (100 µm  ×  100 µm). There was no significant neuronal loss around the implantation sites for most device candidates except the group with largest polymer coating and probe sizes. SIGNIFICANCE: These results suggest that: (1) the degree of mechanical trauma at device implantation and mechanical mismatches at the probe-tissue interface affect long term gliosis; (2) smaller, more flexible probes may minimize the glial response to provide improved tissue biocompatibility when used for chronic neural signal recording; and (3) some degree of glial scarring did not significantly affect neuronal distribution around the probe.

Indexed as

Absorbable ImplantsAnimalsCerebral CortexElectrodes, ImplantedMaleMicroelectrodesNeurogliaPolymersRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyTime FactorsXylenesparylenePolymersXylenes

Identifiers

PMID29485103
PMCPMC7381127
OpenAlexW2791343089

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.