Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29485043›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics2018

Inhibitors of HIF-1α and CXCR4 Mitigate the Development of Radiation Necrosis in Mouse Brain.

Ruimeng Yang, Chong Duan, Liya Yuan, John A Engelbach, Christina I Tsien, Scott C Beeman, Carlos J Perez-Torres, Xia Ge, Keith M Rich, Joseph J H Ackerman and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Cost-effectiveness analysis of bevacizumab for cerebral radiation necrosis treatment based on real-world utility value in China.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Treatment of Radiation-Induced Brain Necrosis.Oxidative medicine and cellular longevity · 2021
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Preclinical MRI: Studies of the irradiated brain.Journal of magnetic resonance (San Diego, Calif. : 1997) · 2018
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ruimeng YangDepartment of Radiology, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China; Department of Radiology, Washington University, St Louis, Missouri.
Chong DuanDepartment of Chemistry, Washington University, St Louis, Missouri.
Liya YuanDepartment of Neurosurgery, Washington University, St Louis, Missouri.
John A EngelbachDepartment of Radiology, Washington University, St Louis, Missouri.
Christina I TsienDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Washington University, St Louis, Missouri.
Scott C BeemanDepartment of Radiology, Washington University, St Louis, Missouri.
Carlos J Perez-TorresDepartment of Radiology, Washington University, St Louis, Missouri.
Xia GeDepartment of Radiology, Washington University, St Louis, Missouri.
Keith M RichDepartment of Neurosurgery, Washington University, St Louis, Missouri; Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University, St Louis, Missouri.
Joseph J H AckermanDepartment of Radiology, Washington University, St Louis, Missouri; Department of Chemistry, Washington University, St Louis, Missouri; Department of Medicine, Washington University, St Louis, Missouri; Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University, St Louis, Missouri.
Joel R GarbowDepartment of Radiology, Washington University, St Louis, Missouri; Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University, St Louis, Missouri. Electronic address: garbow@wustl.edu.
Washington University in St. Louis · USAlvin J. Siteman Cancer Center

Funding

Washington University Center for Cellular ImagingP30CA091842 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI TIMOTHY J. EBERLEIN · 2001 to 2026
$128.0M
IMAGING BIOMARKERS FOR RADIATION-INDUCED NECROSISR01CA155365 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI GARBOW, JOEL RICHARD · 2011 to 2015
$1.5M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA091842NCI NIH HHS R01 CA155365
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThere is mounting evidence that, in addition to angiogenesis, hypoxia-induced inflammation via the hypoxia-inducible factor 1α (HIF-1α)-CXC chemokine receptor 4 (CXCR4) pathway may contribute to the pathogenesis of late-onset, irradiation-induced necrosis. This study investigates the mitigative efficacy of an HIF-1α inhibitor, topotecan, and a CXCR4 antagonist, AMD3100, on the development of radiation necrosis (RN) in an intracranial mouse model. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Mice received a single-fraction, 50-Gy dose of hemispheric irradiation from the Leksell Gamma Knife Perfexion and were then treated with either topotecan, an HIF-1α inhibitor, from 1 to 12 weeks after irradiation, or AMD3100, a CXCR4 antagonist, from 4 to 12 weeks after irradiation. The onset and progression of RN were monitored longitudinally via noninvasive, in vivo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) from 4 to 12 weeks after irradiation. Conventional hematoxylin-eosin staining and immunohistochemistry staining were performed to evaluate the treatment response.

resultsThe progression of brain RN was significantly mitigated for mice treated with either topotecan or AMD3100 compared with control animals. MRI-derived lesion volumes were significantly smaller for both of the treated groups, and histologic findings correlated well with the MRI data. By hematoxylin-eosin staining, both treated groups demonstrated reduced irradiation-induced tissue damage compared with controls. Furthermore, immunohistochemistry results revealed that expression levels of vascular endothelial growth factor, CXC chemokine ligand 12, CD68, CD3, and tumor necrosis factor α in the lesion area were significantly lower in treated (topotecan or AMD3100) brains versus control brains, while ionized calcium-binding adapter molecule 1 (Iba1) and HIF-1α expression was similar, though somewhat reduced. CXCR4 expression was reduced only in topotecan-treated mice, while interleukin 6 expression was unaffected by either topotecan or AMD3100.

conclusionsBy reducing inflammation, both topotecan and AMD3100 can, independently, mitigate the development of RN in the mouse brain. When combined with first-line, antiangiogenic treatment, anti-inflammation therapy may provide an adjuvant therapeutic strategy for clinical, postirradiation management of tumors, with additional benefits in the mitigation of RN development.

Indexed as

AnimalsBenzylaminesBrainCyclamsDisease Models, AnimalDisease ProgressionFemaleHeterocyclic CompoundsHypoxia-Inducible Factor 1, alpha SubunitMagnetic Resonance ImagingMiceMice, Inbred BALB CNecrosisRadiation Injuries, ExperimentalReceptors, CXCR4TopotecanBenzylaminesCyclamsHeterocyclic CompoundsHypoxia-Inducible Factor 1, alpha SubunitplerixaforReceptors, CXCR4Topotecan

Identifiers

PMID29485043
PMCPMC6389273
OpenAlexW2775985338

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.