ArticleAnnals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England2018
Cervical tuberculous lymphadenitis: diagnosis and demographics, a five-year case series in the UK.
Article in Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical characteristics and outcome of Tuberculosis lymphadenitis in a tertiary center from Saudi Arabia.Journal of clinical tuberculosis and other mycobacterial diseases · 2023Article
- Tuberculous Abscesses in the Head and Neck Region.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Left Lateral Cervical Mass with Draining Sinuses.Case reports in medicine · 2019Article
- Cervical Lymphadenopathy in a Nonagenarian Woman: What to Think?European journal of case reports in internal medicine · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Cervical tuberculous lymphadenitis is a low-volume condition in the UK with a potential for delayed diagnosis. This study describes typical demographic and clinical features of patients diagnosed with cervical tuberculous lymphadenitis in a UK population. The utility of cytological, histological and microbiological investigations is reviewed with comparison between fine-needle aspiration and open biopsy. This information can facilitate recognition of new cases and guide initial management. Methods Patients diagnosed with cervical tuberculous lymphadenitis between January 2009 and December 2013 at two district general hospitals were identified from local infectious disease databases. Retrospective case-note review was undertaken to collect demographic and diagnostic data and associated complications. Results Full data were available for 51 patients aged 19-70 years (mean 32.4 years) with mean follow-up of 370 days; 49/51 patients were immigrants to the UK with a wide geographic spread in the countries of origin and time since arrival; 42/51 had no significant comorbidities, although two patients had coexistent HIV infection. The clinical presentation was most frequently without constitutional symptoms (39/51) and often with no history of tuberculosis contact. Posterior triangle neck nodes were most commonly involved (26/51). Conclusion The 'typical' patient with cervical tuberculous lymphadenitis in our region is a young healthy individual who came to the UK from a high-risk country several years earlier. Diagnosis by fine-needle aspiration is as effective as open biopsy if fluid/pus is aspirated. Open biopsy is potentially associated with complications but does not appear to increase chronic wound discharge rates in our series.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.