Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29484623›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2018

Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in a bakery indoor air: trends, dynamics, and dispersion.

Pierina Ielpo, Maria Rosaria Taurino, Riccardo Buccolieri, Claudia Marcella Placentino, Francesco Gallone, Valeria Ancona, Silvana Di Sabatino

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Pierina IelpoWater Research Institute of National Research Council, 5 viale F. de Blasio, 70132, Bari, Italy. piera.ielpo@ba.irsa.cnr.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5579-2872
Maria Rosaria TaurinoAgro. Biolab Laboratory, Km 13,800 S. P. 240, 70018, Rutigliano, Italy.
Riccardo BuccolieriDi.S.Te.B.A. University of Salento, S.P. Lecce-Monteroni, 73100, Lecce, Italy.
Claudia Marcella PlacentinoARPA Puglia, Environmental Protection Regional Agency of Apulia Region, 70126, Bari, Italy.
Francesco GalloneAgro. Biolab Laboratory, Km 13,800 S. P. 240, 70018, Rutigliano, Italy.
Valeria AnconaWater Research Institute of National Research Council, 5 viale F. de Blasio, 70132, Bari, Italy.
Silvana Di SabatinoDipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia, Università di Bologna, viale Berti/Pichat 6/2, 40126, Bologna, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Indoor air pollution assessment in work environments remains challenging due to a combination of logistic reasons and availability of costly instrumentation for data acquisition and post-processing. Existing literature focuses on energy production environments, hospitals, and less so on food production spaces. Studies on indoor air quality in bakeries are scarce or even absent. Motivated by this, the present study investigates indoor air quality in a bakery located in Bari province in South Italy, using a combination of approaches including analytical chemistry analyses and computational fluid dynamics to reconstruct the air ventilation in response to air temperature gradients within the working environment. PM

Indexed as

Food IndustryAir MovementsAir PollutantsAir Pollutants, OccupationalAir Pollution, IndoorHumansItalyPolycyclic Aromatic HydrocarbonsRisk AssessmentUnited StatesUnited States Environmental Protection AgencyWorkplaceAir PollutantsAir Pollutants, OccupationalPolycyclic Aromatic HydrocarbonsCFD (computational fluid dynamics) simulationsHealth risk assessmentIndoorOccupational exposurePAHs

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.