ArticleObesity surgery2018
Sensitivity and Specificity of 50% Excess Weight Loss (50%EWL) and Twelve Other Bariatric Criteria for Weight Loss Success.
Article in Obesity surgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
65 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- SADI-S, state of the art. Indications and results in 2024: a systematic review of literature.Updates in surgery · 2025Pooled it
- Meta-analysis of changes in skeletal muscle mass within 1 year after bariatric surgery.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Pooled it
- Metabolic-Associated Fatty Liver Disease and Weight Loss After Bariatric Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Obesity surgery · 2024Pooled it
- Treatment Options for Weight Regain or Insufficient Weight Loss After Sleeve Gastrectomy: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Obesity surgery · 2022Pooled it
- What Is Weight Loss After Bariatric Surgery Expressed in Percentage Total Weight Loss (%TWL)? A Systematic Review.Obesity surgery · 2021Pooled it
- Primary Banded Sleeve Gastrectomy: a Systematic Review.Obesity surgery · 2019Pooled it
- Effect of a 16-Week Exercise Program After Bariatric Surgery on Sarcopenia Parameters Based on FNIH, EWGSOP2, and EASO/ESPEN Criteria: the Results of the EXPOBAR Randomized Trial Program.Obesity surgery · 2025Trial
- Five-year outcomes of a randomized controlled trial evaluating a non-adjustable ring in Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Trial
- Trial
- Application of Machine Learning to Predict 1-Year Weight Loss Outcomes After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy.Obesity surgery · 2026Article
- Construction of a Prediction Model for Inadequate Weight Loss After Sleeve Gastrectomy Based on Preoperative Indicators.Obesity surgery · 2026Article
- Rapid Recurrent Weight Gain Within Two Years of Sleeve Gastrectomy: Clinical Predictors and Metabolic Consequences.Obesity surgery · 2026Article
- Impact of preoperative and postoperative anti-obesity medications on early postoperative body mass index reduction after sleeve gastrectomy in pediatrics.Surgery for obesity and related diseases : official journal of the American Society for Bariatric Surgery · 2026Article
- Preliminary assessment of sarcopenic obesity risk after sleeve gastrectomy using dual-modality imaging: a six-month MRI and DXA pilot study in women.Frontiers in aging · 2026Article
- Multivariate Trajectories of Weight and Mental Health and Their Prognostic Significance 6 Years After Obesity Surgery.The International journal of eating disorders · 2025Article
- A New Nomogram for Predicting Early Weight Loss Outcomes in Patients with Obesity Following Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy.Obesity surgery · 2025Article
- Clinical outcomes of varying age groups following vertical sleeve gastrectomy: a retrospective study using the 2022 Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program database in the United States.Journal of minimally invasive surgery · 2025Article
- Ring Augmentation of the Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis of 5-Year Follow-Up Results.Obesity surgery · 2025Article
- Preoperative Body Composition Analysis as a Predictor of Weight Loss Outcomes Following Bariatric Surgery: A Bioelectrical Impedance Study.Obesity surgery · 2025Article
- Waist Circumference Is a Strong Predictor of a Positive Outcome Evaluated One Year After Sleeve Gastrectomy.Obesity surgery · 2025Article
5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCriteria for bariatric weight loss success are numerous. Most of them are arbitrary. None of them is evidence-based. Our objective was to determine their sensitivity and specificity.
methodsThirteen common bariatric weight loss criteria were compared to a benchmark reflecting the gold standard in bariatric surgery. We used an elaborate baseline BMI-independent weight loss percentile chart, based on retrospective data after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB), performed between 2007 and 2017. Percentile curves p31.6 (patients' expectation), p25 (interquartile range), p15.9 (1 standard deviation (SD) below median), and p10.9 (surgeons' goal) were used as possible cutoff for success to determine true or false positive and negative results beyond 1 year.
resultsWe operated 4497 primary LRYGB patients, with mean follow-up 22 (± 1 SD 19; range 0-109) months, 3031 patients with last result ≥ 1 year, 518 ≥ 5 years. For all four cutoff percentile curves for success, specificities were low (2-72%) for criteria < 35 body mass index (BMI), ≥ 25percentage excess BMI loss (%EBMIL), ≥ 50%EBMIL, ≥ 15 percentage total weight loss (%TWL), ≥ 20%TWL, ≥ 25 percentage excess weight loss (%EWL), and high (83-96%) for < 30 BMI. No criterion had > 80% specificity and sensitivity for a cutoff above p15.9. For p15.9, they were both > 80% for criteria ≥ 10 BMI reduction and ≥ 50%EWL, both > 90% for ≥ 25%TWL and ≥ 35 percentage alterable weight loss (%AWL). All criteria had high sensitivities for all cutoff percentile curves (87-100%), except < 30 BMI (65-78%).
conclusionsFor the first time, common bariatric criteria for weight loss success were systematically validated. Most criteria recognized success very well (high sensitivities), but ≥ 15%TWL, ≥ 20%TWL, < 35BMI, ≥ 25%EWL, ≥ 25%EBMIL, and ≥ 50%EBMIL left too many poor responders unnoticed (low specificities). Bariatric weight loss success is best assessed by comparing results to percentile curve 1 SD below median (p15.9) in a bariatric baseline BMI-independent weight loss percentile chart. Criteria ≥ 35%AWL and ≥ 25%TWL came close to that curve, both with > 90% sensitivity and specificity. Among others, criterion ≥ 50%EBMIL did not.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29484610What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.