Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29484459›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2018

Simultaneous multislice diffusion-weighted imaging in whole-body positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging for multiparametric examination in oncological patients.

Jana Taron, Christina Schraml, Christina Pfannenberg, Matthias Reimold, Nina Schwenzer, Konstantin Nikolaou, Petros Martirosian, Ferdinand Seith

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jana TaronDiagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Department of Radiology, University Hospital of Tuebingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Str. 3, 72076, Tuebingen, Germany.
Christina SchramlDiagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Department of Radiology, University Hospital of Tuebingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Str. 3, 72076, Tuebingen, Germany.
Christina PfannenbergDiagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Department of Radiology, University Hospital of Tuebingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Str. 3, 72076, Tuebingen, Germany.
Matthias ReimoldNuclear Medicine and Clinical Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, Eberhard Karls University, Otfried-Mueller-Str. 14, 72076, Tuebingen, Germany.
Nina SchwenzerSection on Experimental Radiology, Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Department of Radiology, University Hospital of Tuebingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Str. 3, 72076, Tuebingen, Germany.
Konstantin NikolaouDiagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Department of Radiology, University Hospital of Tuebingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Str. 3, 72076, Tuebingen, Germany.
Petros MartirosianSection on Experimental Radiology, Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Department of Radiology, University Hospital of Tuebingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Str. 3, 72076, Tuebingen, Germany. petros.martirosian@med.uni-tuebingen.de.
Ferdinand SeithDiagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Department of Radiology, University Hospital of Tuebingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Str. 3, 72076, Tuebingen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic performance of simultaneous multislice diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI-SMS) with that of standard DWI (DWI-STD) in whole-body 3-T PET/MRI examination protocols in oncological patients.

methodsIn a phantom study, we evaluated the apparent diffusion coefficients (ADC) from the two techniques. In ten volunteers, we assessed ADC values in different organs. In 20 oncological patients, we evaluated subjective image quality (Likert scale, 5 indicating excellent) and artefacts in different body regions. We also rated the conspicuity and acquired the ADC values of PET-positive tumorous lesions.

resultsThe scan time for the whole-body DWI-SMS examinations was 40% shorter than the scan time for the DWI-STD examinations (84 s vs. 140 s per table position). The phantom and volunteer studies showed lower ADC values from DWI-SMS in the liver and muscle (psoas muscle 1.4 vs. 1.3). In patients, DWI-SMS provided poorer subjective image quality in the thoracoabdominal region (3.0 vs. 3.8, p = 0.02) and overall more artefacts (138 vs. 105). No significant differences regarding conspicuity and ADC values of lesions were found.

conclusionsDWI-SMS seems to provide reliable conspicuity and ADC values of tumorous lesions similar to those provided by DWI-STD. Therefore, although providing poorer image quality in certain regions, DWI-SMS can clearly reduce PET/MRI scan times in oncological patients. KEY POINTS: • DWI-SMS can reduce PET/MRI scan times in oncological patients. • DWI-SMS provides reliable ADC values and good lesion conspicuity similar to those provided by DWI-STD. • DWI-SMS may provide poorer image quality in regions with low signal.

Indexed as

AdultAgedArtifactsDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingFemaleHumansLiverMaleMiddle AgedMultimodal ImagingNeoplasmsPhantoms, ImagingPositron-Emission TomographyProspective StudiesReproducibility of ResultsTomography, X-Ray ComputedDiffusion-weighted imagingMultiparametricOncologyPositron emission tomographyWhole-body

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.