ArticleCurrent microbiology2018
Assessment of Multi Fragment Melting Analysis System (MFMAS) for the Identification of Food-Borne Yeasts.
Article in Current microbiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- High-Resolution Melting Analysis Potential forBiotech (Basel (Switzerland)) · 2024Article
- Update of the list of QPS-recommended biological agents intentionally added to food or feed as notified to EFSA 10: Suitability of taxonomic units notified to EFSA until March 2019.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Multi Fragment Melting Analysis System (MFMAS) is a novel approach that was developed for the species-level identification of microorganisms. It is a software-assisted system that performs concurrent melting analysis of 8 different DNA fragments to obtain a fingerprint of each strain analyzed. The identification is performed according to the comparison of these fingerprints with the fingerprints of known yeast species recorded in a database to obtain the best possible match. In this study, applicability of the yeast version of the MFMAS (MFMAS-yeast) was evaluated for the identification of food-associated yeast species. For this purpose, in this study, a total of 145 yeast strains originated from foods and beverages and 19 standard yeast strains were tested. The DNAs isolated from these yeast strains were analyzed by the MFMAS, and their species were successfully identified with a similarity rate of 95% or higher. It was shown that the strains belonged to 43 different yeast species that are widely found in the foods. A clear discrimination was also observed in the phylogenetically related species. In conclusion, it might be suggested that the MFMAS-yeast seems to be a highly promising approach for a rapid, accurate, and one-step identification of the yeasts isolated from food products and/or their processing environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.