ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2018
Long-term Non-Invasive Ventilation in Infants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- Liberation and mortality outcomes in pediatric long-term ventilation: A qualitative systematic review.Pediatric pulmonology · 2020Pooled it
- Non-invasive ventilation treatment and craniofacial growth in children: A scoping review.Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung · 2026Article
- Diagnosis, Treatment, and Follow-Up of Tracheo/Bronchomalacia in Children: The Italian Multicenter Experience.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Home mechanical ventilation in children: evolving indications in an era of new treatment options.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2024Review
- Respiratory and Neurodevelopmental Outcomes at 3 Years of Age of Neonates Diagnosed with Sleep-Disordered Breathing.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- An update on diagnosis and management of obstructive sleep apnoea in the first 2 years of life.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2024Review
- The experience of children using long-term non-invasive ventilation: a qualitative study.Frontiers in sleep · 2024Article
- Post-acute day and night non-invasive respiratory intervention use and outcome: A brief report.Journal of pediatric rehabilitation medicine · 2024Article
- Comparison of non-invasive ventilation use and outcomes in children with Down syndrome and other children using this technology.Frontiers in sleep · 2023Article
- Polysomnography in infants with clinical suspicion of sleep-related breathing disorders.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2022Article
- Non-Invasive Respiratory Assessment in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: From Clinical Research to Outcome Measures.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Article
- Editorial: Pediatric Long-Term Non-invasive Ventilation.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2021Article
- Management and current status of spinal muscular atrophy: a retrospective multicentre claims database analysis.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2020Article
- Non-invasive Ventilation in Children With Neuromuscular Disease.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2020Review
- Long-Term Non-invasive Ventilation in Children: Current Use, Indications, and Contraindications.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2020Review
- Question 3: What are the indications for and challenges in performing polysomnography in infants?Paediatric respiratory reviews · 2019Review
- Long-term Non-Invasive Ventilation in Infants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe use of long-term non-invasive ventilation (NIV) to treat sleep and breathing disorders in children has increased substantially in the last decade; however, less data exist about its use in infants. Given that infants have distinct sleep and breathing patterns when compared to older children, the outcomes of infants on long-term NIV may differ as well. The aim of this study is to systematically review the use and outcomes of long-term NIV in infants.
methodsOvid Medline, Ovid Embase, CINAHL (via EbscoHOST), PubMed, and Wiley Cochrane Library were systematically searched from January 1990 to July 2017. Studies on infants using long-term NIV outside of an acute care setting were included. Data were extracted on study design, population characteristics, and NIV outcomes.
resultsA total of 327 studies were full-text reviewed, with final inclusion of 60. Studies were distributed across airway (40%), neuromuscular (28%), central nervous system (10%), cardio-respiratory (2%), and multiple (20%) disease categories. Of the 18 airway studies reporting on NIV outcomes, 13 (72%) reported improvements in respiratory parameters. Of the 12 neuromuscular studies exclusively on spinal muscular atrophy type 1 (SMA1), six (50%) reported decreased hospitalizations and nine (75%) reported on mortality outcomes. Risk of bias was moderate to serious, and quality of the evidence was low to very low for all studies. Most studies had an observational design with no control group, limiting the potential for a meta-analysis.
conclusionThe outcomes reported in studies differed by the disease category being studied. Studies on airway conditions showed improvements in respiratory parameters for infants using NIV. Studies on neuromuscular disorder, which were almost exclusively on SMA1, reported decreased hospitalizations and prolonged survival. Overall, it appears that NIV is an effective long-term therapy for infants. However, the high risk of bias and low quality of the available evidence limited strong conclusions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.