Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29484285›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2018

Utility of Glioblastoma Patient-Derived Orthotopic Xenografts in Drug Discovery and Personalized Therapy.

Michele Patrizii, Monica Bartucci, Sharon R Pine, Hatem E Sabaawy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 74 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
74citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

74 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. A Bibenzyl fromAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

14 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Michele PatriziiGraduate Program in Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology, RBHS-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Piscataway, NJ, United States.
Monica BartucciRutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, United States.
Sharon R PineGraduate Program in Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology, RBHS-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Piscataway, NJ, United States.
Hatem E SabaawyGraduate Program in Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology, RBHS-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Piscataway, NJ, United States.

Funding

TRANSCRIPTIONAL PROFILINGP30CA072720 · NCI · UNIV OF MED/DENT NJ-R W JOHNSON MED SCH · PI Tracie Saunders · 1997 to 2026
$94.5M
Mechanisms of targeting cellular self-renewal in glioblastomaR01CA226746 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI SABAAWY, HATIM · 2018 to 2022
$2.3M
Sox9 signaling in lung adenocarcinomaR01CA190578 · NCI · RBHS -CANCER INSTITUTE OF NEW JERSEY · PI PINE, SHARON R. · 2014 to 2018
$1.7M
Proteasomal regulation of BMI-1 and impact on tumor initiating cells in glioblastomaF31CA220839 · NCI · RBHS -CANCER INSTITUTE OF NEW JERSEY · PI PATRIZII, MICHELE · 2017 to 2018
$71k
NCI NIH HHS F31 CA220839NCI NIH HHS P30 CA072720NCI NIH HHS R01 CA190578NCI NIH HHS R01 CA226746
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite substantial effort and resources dedicated to drug discovery and development, new anticancer agents often fail in clinical trials. Among many reasons, the lack of reliable predictive preclinical cancer models is a fundamental one. For decades, immortalized cancer cell cultures have been used to lay the groundwork for cancer biology and the quest for therapeutic responses. However, cell lines do not usually recapitulate cancer heterogeneity or reveal therapeutic resistance cues. With the rapidly evolving exploration of cancer "omics," the scientific community is increasingly investigating whether the employment of short-term patient-derived tumor cell cultures (two- and three-dimensional) and/or patient-derived xenograft models might provide a more representative delineation of the cancer core and its therapeutic response. Patient-derived cancer models allow the integration of genomic with drug sensitivity data on a personalized basis and currently represent the ultimate approach for preclinical drug development and biomarker discovery. The proper use of these patient-derived cancer models might soon influence clinical outcomes and allow the implementation of tailored personalized therapy. When assessing drug efficacy for the treatment of glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), currently, the most reliable models are generated through direct injection of patient-derived cells or more frequently the isolation of glioblastoma cells endowed with stem-like features and orthotopically injecting these cells into the cerebrum of immunodeficient mice. Herein, we present the key strengths, weaknesses, and potential applications of cell- and animal-based models of GBM, highlighting our experience with the glioblastoma stem-like patient cell-derived xenograft model and its utility in drug discovery.

Indexed as

glioblastomamouse modelspatient-derived xenograftspersonalized therapyprecision medicine

Identifiers

PMID29484285
PMCPMC5816058

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.