Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29484188›Full record

ArticleJournal of intensive care2018

The safety of a novel early mobilization protocol conducted by ICU physicians: a prospective observational study.

Keibun Liu, Takayuki Ogura, Kunihiko Takahashi, Mitsunobu Nakamura, Hiroaki Ohtake, Kenji Fujiduka, Emi Abe, Hitoshi Oosaki, Dai Miyazaki, Hiroyuki Suzuki and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of intensive care, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Analysis of rehabilitation in stroke patients in a High Dependency Unit.American journal of translational research · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Keibun LiuAdvanced Medical Emergency Department and Critical Care Center, Japan Red Cross Maebashi Hospital, 3-21-36 Asahi-cho, Maebashi, Gunma 371-0014 Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-6867-1420
Takayuki OguraAdvanced Medical Emergency Department and Critical Care Center, Japan Red Cross Maebashi Hospital, 3-21-36 Asahi-cho, Maebashi, Gunma 371-0014 Japan.
Kunihiko Takahashi2Department of Biostatistics, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Tsurumai-cho 64, Syowa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi 466-8560 Japan.
Mitsunobu Nakamura2Department of Biostatistics, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Tsurumai-cho 64, Syowa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi 466-8560 Japan.
Hiroaki OhtakeDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Japan Red Cross Maebashi Hospital, 3-21-36 Asahi-cho, Maebashi, Gunma 371-0014 Japan.
Kenji FujidukaAdvanced Medical Emergency Department and Critical Care Center, Japan Red Cross Maebashi Hospital, 3-21-36 Asahi-cho, Maebashi, Gunma 371-0014 Japan.
Emi AbeDepartment of Nursing, Intensive Care Unit, Japan Red Cross Maebashi Hospital, 3-21-36 Asahi-cho, Maebashi, Gunma 371-0014 Japan.
Hitoshi OosakiDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Japan Red Cross Maebashi Hospital, 3-21-36 Asahi-cho, Maebashi, Gunma 371-0014 Japan.
Dai MiyazakiAdvanced Medical Emergency Department and Critical Care Center, Japan Red Cross Maebashi Hospital, 3-21-36 Asahi-cho, Maebashi, Gunma 371-0014 Japan.
Hiroyuki SuzukiAdvanced Medical Emergency Department and Critical Care Center, Japan Red Cross Maebashi Hospital, 3-21-36 Asahi-cho, Maebashi, Gunma 371-0014 Japan.
Mitsuaki NishikimiAdvanced Medical Emergency Department and Critical Care Center, Japan Red Cross Maebashi Hospital, 3-21-36 Asahi-cho, Maebashi, Gunma 371-0014 Japan.
Alan Kawarai Lefor5Department of Surgery, Jichi Medical University, 3311-1 Yakushiji, Shimotsukeshi, Tochigi, 329-0498 Japan.
Takashi Mato6Department of Emergency Medicine, Jichi Medical University, 3311-1 Yakushiji, Shimotsukeshi, Tochigi, 329-0498 Japan.
Maebashi Red Cross Hospital · JPJichi Medical University · JPNagoya University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere are numerous barriers to early mobilization (EM) in a resource-limited intensive care unit (ICU) without a specialized team or an EM culture, regarding patient stability while critically ill or in the presence of medical devices. We hypothesized that ICU physicians can overcome these barriers. The aim of this study was to investigate the safety of EM according to the Maebashi EM protocol conducted by ICU physicians.

methodsThis was a single-center prospective observational study. All consecutive patients with an unplanned emergency admission were included in this study, according to the exclusion criteria. The observation period was from June 2015 to June 2016. Data regarding adverse events, medical devices in place during rehabilitation, protocol adherence, and rehabilitation outcomes were collected. The primary outcome was safety.

resultsA total of 232 consecutively enrolled patients underwent 587 rehabilitation sessions. Thirteen adverse events occurred (2.2%; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-3.8%) and no specific treatment was needed. There were no instances of dislodgement or obstruction of medical devices, tubes, or lines. The incidence of adverse events associated with mechanical ventilation or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) was 2.4 and 3.6%, respectively. Of 587 sessions, 387 (66%) sessions were performed at the active rehabilitation level, including sitting out of the bed, active transfer to a chair, standing, marching, and ambulating. ICU physicians attended over 95% of these active rehabilitation sessions. Of all patients, 143 (62%) got out of bed within 2 days (median 1.2 days; interquartile range 0.1-2.0).

conclusionsEM according to the Maebashi EM protocol conducted by ICU physicians, without a specialized team or EM culture, was performed at a level of safety similar to previous studies performed by specialized teams, even with medical devices in place, including mechanical ventilation or ECMO. Protocolized EM led by ICU physicians can be initiated in the acute phase of critical illness without serious adverse events requiring additional treatment.

Indexed as

Acute phaseEarly mobilizationICU physiciansMedical devicesProtocolSafety

Identifiers

PMID29484188
PMCPMC5819168
OpenAlexW2797452152

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.