ArticleJournal of intensive care2018
The safety of a novel early mobilization protocol conducted by ICU physicians: a prospective observational study.
Article in Journal of intensive care, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.
- Guideline on positioning and early mobilisation in the critically ill by an expert panel.Intensive care medicine · 2024Guideline
- Effect of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation for Older Critically Ill Patients in the ICU: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Critical care explorations · 2025Trial
- Factors associated with ABCDEF bundle implementation for critically ill patients: An international cross-sectional survey in 54 countries.SAGE open medicine · 2025Article
- From bedside to recovery: exercise therapy for prevention of post-intensive care syndrome.Journal of intensive care · 2024Review
- Early Rehabilitation Activity and Rehabilitation in ICU Wards in Central China: A Cross-Sectional Survey.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2024Article
- Efficacy of compliance with ventilator-associated pneumonia care bundle: A 24-month longitudinal study at Bach Mai Hospital, Vietnam.SAGE open medicine · 2024Article
- Article
- Efficacy of Early Rehabilitation for Severe Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pneumonia: Factor Analysis Using Machine Learning.Progress in rehabilitation medicine · 2023Article
- Mobilization and Rehabilitation Practice in ICUs During the COVID-19 Pandemic.Journal of intensive care medicine · 2022Article
- Time to active sitting position: One-year findings from a temporary COVID-19 intensive care unit.Respiratory medicine · 2022Article
- Clinical effects of neuroendoscopic hematoma evacuation for hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage.American journal of translational research · 2022Article
- Changes in barriers to implementing early mobilization in the intensive care unit: a single center retrospective cohort study.Nagoya journal of medical science · 2021Article
- ABCDEF Bundle and Supportive ICU Practices for Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019 Infection: An International Point Prevalence Study.Critical care explorations · 2021Article
- Analysis of rehabilitation in stroke patients in a High Dependency Unit.American journal of translational research · 2021Article
- Effects of the Intensity and Activity Time of Early Rehabilitation on Activities of Daily Living Dependence in Mechanically Ventilated Patients.Progress in rehabilitation medicine · 2021Article
- Implementation of the ABCDEF Bundle for Critically Ill ICU Patients During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Multi-National 1-Day Point Prevalence Study.Frontiers in medicine · 2021Article
- The Safety and Effect of Early Mobilization in the Intensive Care Unit According to Cancellation Criteria.Progress in rehabilitation medicine · 2020Article
- Effectiveness, Safety, and Barriers to Early Mobilization in the Intensive Care Unit.Critical care research and practice · 2020Review
- Early mobilisation in mechanically ventilated patients: a systematic integrative review of definitions and activities.Journal of intensive care · 2019Article
- A Constructivist Grounded Theory of Staff Experiences Relating to Early Mobilisation of Mechanically Ventilated Patients in Intensive Care.Global qualitative nursing researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThere are numerous barriers to early mobilization (EM) in a resource-limited intensive care unit (ICU) without a specialized team or an EM culture, regarding patient stability while critically ill or in the presence of medical devices. We hypothesized that ICU physicians can overcome these barriers. The aim of this study was to investigate the safety of EM according to the Maebashi EM protocol conducted by ICU physicians.
methodsThis was a single-center prospective observational study. All consecutive patients with an unplanned emergency admission were included in this study, according to the exclusion criteria. The observation period was from June 2015 to June 2016. Data regarding adverse events, medical devices in place during rehabilitation, protocol adherence, and rehabilitation outcomes were collected. The primary outcome was safety.
resultsA total of 232 consecutively enrolled patients underwent 587 rehabilitation sessions. Thirteen adverse events occurred (2.2%; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-3.8%) and no specific treatment was needed. There were no instances of dislodgement or obstruction of medical devices, tubes, or lines. The incidence of adverse events associated with mechanical ventilation or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) was 2.4 and 3.6%, respectively. Of 587 sessions, 387 (66%) sessions were performed at the active rehabilitation level, including sitting out of the bed, active transfer to a chair, standing, marching, and ambulating. ICU physicians attended over 95% of these active rehabilitation sessions. Of all patients, 143 (62%) got out of bed within 2 days (median 1.2 days; interquartile range 0.1-2.0).
conclusionsEM according to the Maebashi EM protocol conducted by ICU physicians, without a specialized team or EM culture, was performed at a level of safety similar to previous studies performed by specialized teams, even with medical devices in place, including mechanical ventilation or ECMO. Protocolized EM led by ICU physicians can be initiated in the acute phase of critical illness without serious adverse events requiring additional treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.