ArticleFrontline gastroenterology2018
Establishing the aims, format and function for multidisciplinary team-driven care within an inflammatory bowel disease service: a multicentre qualitative specialist-based consensus study.
Article in Frontline gastroenterology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Defining the Roles of Inflammatory Bowel Disease Clinical Pharmacists in the United States: A Systematic Review and National RAND/UCLA Consensus.Inflammatory bowel diseases · 2024Pooled it
- Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) position statement of the Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery (SICCR): general principles of IBD management.Techniques in coloproctology · 2020Guideline
- Construction and clinical validation of a Team STEPPS-based discharge planning program for patients with inflammatory bowel disease.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Trial
- Endometriosis MDC: role of the radiologist.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2025Review
- Role of the Dietitian in the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Multidisciplinary Team.Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2025Review
- Asia Pacific association of gastroenterology consensus statements on histopathological evaluation of inflammatory bowel diseases.Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2025Article
- Not just a BLiP: early experience with a novel multidisciplinary case conference for benign hepatopancreatobiliary disease at a tertiary Canadian healthcare center.Surgical endoscopy · 2024Article
- Consensus for criteria of running a pediatric inflammatory bowel disease center using a modified Delphi approach.World journal of pediatrics : WJP · 2023Article
- The 2023 Impact of Inflammatory Bowel Disease in Canada: Access to and Models of Care.Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2023Review
- Core indicators of an evaluation and guidance system for quality of care in inflammatory bowel disease centers: A critical review.EClinicalMedicine · 2022Review
- Surgical Planning in Penetrating Abdominal Crohn's Disease.Frontiers in surgery · 2022Review
- The Impact of Multidisciplinary Conferences on Treatment Plans for Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease in a Tertiary Canadian Centre.Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2021Article
- The Management of the Hospitalized Ulcerative Colitis Patient, the Medical-Surgical Conundrum.Current gastroenterology reports · 2021Review
- The Management of the Hospitalized Ulcerative Colitis Patient: the Medical-Surgical Conundrum.Current gastroenterology reports · 2020Review
- A Systematic Review of Self-Management Interventions for Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease.Inflammatory intestinal diseasesReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo obtain a specialist-based consensus on the aims, format and function for MDT-driven care within an inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) service.
designThis was a prospective, multicentre study using a Delphi formal consensus-building methodology.
settingParticipants were recruited nationally across 13 centres from July to August 2014.
participants24 participants were included into the Delphi Specialist Consensus Panel. They included six consultant colorectal surgeons, six gastroenterologists, five consultant radiologists, three consultant histopathologists and 4 IBD nurse specialists.
interventionsPanellists ranked items on a Likert scale (1=not important to 5=very important). Items with a median score >3 were considered eligible for inclusion.
main outcome measuresConsensus was defined with an IQR ≤1. Consensus on categorical responses was defined by an agreement of >60%.
resultsA consensus on items (median; IQR) that described the aims of the MDT-driven care that were considered
conclusionsThis study has provided a consensus for proposed aims, overall design, format and function MDT-driven care within an IBD service. This can provide a focus for core members, and aid a contractual recognition to ensure attendance and proactive contribution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.