ArticleFrontline gastroenterology2018
How are we managing fistulating perianal Crohn's disease? Results of a national survey of consultant gastroenterologists.
Article in Frontline gastroenterology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Determination of the approach of Polish gastroenterologists and surgeons to the diagnosis and treatment of complex cases of Crohn's disease-related perianal fistulas.Przeglad gastroenterologiczny · 2026Article
- Clinician management of patients with Crohn's-related perianal fistulas: results of a multispecialty case-based survey.BMJ open gastroenterology · 2025Article
- Treatment escalation and de-escalation decisions in Crohn's disease: Delphi consensus recommendations from Japan, 2021.Journal of gastroenterology · 2023Review
- Patient preferences and current practice for adults with steroid-resistant ulcerative colitis: POPSTER mixed-methods study.Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) · 2022Article
- The Optimal Management of Fistulizing Crohn's Disease: Evidence beyond Randomized Clinical Trials.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- Combined therapy with early initiation of infliximab following drainage of perianal fistulising Crohn's disease: a retrospective cohort study.BMC gastroenterology · 2022Article
- Approach to medical therapy in perianal Crohn's disease.World journal of gastroenterology · 2021Review
- Perianal fistulodesis - A pilot study of a novel minimally invasive surgical and medical approach for closure of perianal fistulae.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2021Article
- Current review of the management of fistulising perianal Crohn's disease.Frontline gastroenterology · 2021Article
- Crohn's disease: management in adults, children and young people - concise guidance .Clinical medicine (London, England) · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveFistulating perianal Crohn's disease represents a significant challenge to both clinicians and patients. This survey set out to describe current practice and variation in the medical management of this condition.
designA survey was designed by an expert group of gastroenterologists and surgeons with an inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) interest. The questionnaire aimed to capture opinions from consultant gastroenterologists with a UK practice on the management of acutely symptomatic fistula, assessment of a new fistula presentation, medical management strategies and surgical intervention. The survey was piloted at the British Society of Gastroenterology Clinical Research Group meeting, and distributed at UK gastroenterology meetings.
resultsThere were 111 completed responses (response rate 55%). Following clearance of sepsis, 22.1% of respondents would wait 6 weeks or more before commencing medical therapy. Antibiotics were used by 89.2%, with a variable duration. First-line medical therapy was thiopurine for 48% and antitumour necrosis factor (TNF) for 50% of respondents. These were used in combination by 44.4%. Interval to escalation of therapy (if required) varied from 1 month to a year. Anti-TNF therapies were favoured in deteriorating patients. An IBD multidisciplinary team was accessible to 98%, although only 23.6% routinely discussed these patients. Optimisation strategies for anti-TNF and thiopurines were used by 70% of respondents. Recurrent sepsis, refractory disease and patient choice are indications for surgical referral.
conclusionThese results illustrate the huge variation in practice and lack of consensus among physicians for the optimal medical management of perianal Crohn's disease. There are gaps in knowledge that require targeted research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.