Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29483665›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2018

The association between cancer family history and ovarian cancer risk in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers: can it be explained by the mutation position?

Natalia Teixeira, Annemieke van der Hout, Jan C Oosterwijk, Janet R Vos, HEBON, Peter Devilee, Klaartje van Engelen, Hanne Meijers-Heijboer, Rob B van der Luijt, Mieke Kriege and 5 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Contemporary risk assessment and risk-reducing strategies for tubo-ovarian cancer in women with BRCA pathogenic variants.International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society · 2026
    Review
  3. Frontiers in oncology · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Prevalence and Spectrum of GermlineFrontiers in oncology · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Natalia TeixeiraDepartment of Epidemiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands. n.teixeira@umcg.nl.
Annemieke van der HoutDepartment of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Jan C OosterwijkDepartment of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Janet R VosDepartment of Epidemiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
HEBON
Peter DevileeDepartment of Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, University of Leiden, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Klaartje van EngelenDepartment of Clinical Genetics, VU University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Hanne Meijers-HeijboerDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Rob B van der LuijtDepartment of Clinical Genetics, University Medical Center Utrecht, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Mieke KriegeDepartment of Medical Oncology, Family Cancer Clinic, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Arjen R MensenkampDepartment of Human Genetics, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3805-877X
Matti A RookusDepartment of Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Kees E van RoozendaalDepartment of Clinical Genetics, University Hospital of Maastricht, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Marian J E MouritsDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Geertruida H de BockDepartment of Epidemiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3104-4471
University Medical Center Groningen · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NLUtrecht University · NLAmsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam · NLLeiden University Medical Center · NLThe Netherlands Cancer Institute · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This observational study aimed to investigate whether the reported association between family history (FH) of breast cancer (BC) or ovarian cancer (OC) and OC risks in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers can be explained by mutation position on the gene. In total, 3310 female BRCA1/2 mutation carriers participating in a nationwide prospective cohort (Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer in the Netherlands) were included. FH was classified according to cancer occurrence in first-degree relatives (BC only, OC only, both, neither) and mutations were classified according to their position on the gene (OC cluster region (OCCR), BC cluster region, neither). The main outcome was OC occurrence. Cox proportional-hazard models were applied to investigate the association between FH and OC risks before and after adjusting for mutation position. Of all women included, 202 were diagnosed with OC. A BC-only FH tended to be associated with lower OC risks when compared with a FH without BC/OC (HR: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.52-1.17; HR: 0.59, 95% CI: 0.33-1.07 for BRCA1 and BRCA2, respectively) while an OC-only FH tended to be associated with higher risks (HR: 1.58, 95% CI: 0.90-2.77; HR: 1.75, 95% CI: 0.70-4.37 for BRCA1 and BRCA2, respectively). After adjusting for mutation position, association between FH and OC risks was slightly smaller in magnitude (HR: 0.85, 95% CI: 0.55-1.30; HR: 0.64, 95% CI: 0.34-1.21 for BC-only FH in BRCA1 and BRCA2, respectively; HR: 1.46, 95% CI: 0.80-2.68; HR: 1.49, 95% CI: 0.44-4.02 for OC-only FH in BRCA1 and BRCA2, respectively), indicating that mutation position explains only part of the association. Considering the magnitude of the observed trend, we do not believe FH should be used to change counseling regarding OC prevention.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBRCA1 ProteinBRCA2 ProteinBreast NeoplasmsCohort StudiesFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansMedical History TakingMiddle AgedMutationNetherlandsOvarian NeoplasmsRisk FactorsBRCA1 ProteinBRCA1 protein, humanBRCA2 ProteinBRCA2 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID29483665
PMCPMC5974362
OpenAlexW2793910282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.