Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29483654›Full record

ArticleNature genetics2018

The human noncoding genome defined by genetic diversity.

Julia di Iulio, Istvan Bartha, Emily H M Wong, Hung-Chun Yu, Victor Lavrenko, Dongchan Yang, Inkyung Jung, Michael A Hicks, Naisha Shah, Ewen F Kirkness and 5 more

Open access · greenAbstract readLetter
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature genetics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 103 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
103citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

103 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 187 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Just a SNP away: The future ofCell insight · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. A survey of k-mer methods and applications in bioinformatics.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

43 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Julia di IulioHuman Longevity, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA.
Istvan BarthaHuman Longevity, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA.
Emily H M WongHuman Longevity, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA.
Hung-Chun YuHuman Longevity, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4980-8508
Victor LavrenkoHuman Longevity, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA.
Dongchan YangDepartment of Biological Science, Korea Advanced Institute of Science & Technology, Daejeon, Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2311-5794
Inkyung JungDepartment of Biological Science, Korea Advanced Institute of Science & Technology, Daejeon, Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5885-2754
Michael A HicksHuman Longevity, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1045-2660
Naisha ShahHuman Longevity, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA.
Ewen F KirknessHuman Longevity, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA.
Martin M FabaniHuman Longevity, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA.
William H BiggsHuman Longevity, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA.
Bing RenLudwig Institute for Cancer Research, La Jolla, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5435-1127
J Craig VenterHuman Longevity, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA.
Amalio TelentiJ. Craig Venter Institute , La Jolla, CA, USA. atelenti@scripps.edu.
Human Longevity (United States) · USKorea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology · KRScripps Research Institute · USHistogen (United States) · USJ. Craig Venter Institute · USLudwig Cancer Research · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the significance of genetic variants in the noncoding genome is emerging as the next challenge in human genomics. We used the power of 11,257 whole-genome sequences and 16,384 heptamers (7-nt motifs) to build a map of sequence constraint for the human species. This build differed substantially from traditional maps of interspecies conservation and identified regulatory elements among the most constrained regions of the genome. Using new Hi-C experimental data, we describe a strong pattern of coordination over 2 Mb where the most constrained regulatory elements associate with the most essential genes. Constrained regions of the noncoding genome are up to 52-fold enriched for known pathogenic variants as compared to unconstrained regions (21-fold when compared to the genome average). This map of sequence constraint across thousands of individuals is an asset to help interpret noncoding elements in the human genome, prioritize variants and reconsider gene units at a larger scale.

Indexed as

Genetic VariationGenome, HumanChromosome MappingComputational BiologyConserved SequenceEvolution, MolecularFemaleHumansMaleRegulatory Sequences, Nucleic AcidRNA, UntranslatedRNA, Untranslated

Identifiers

PMID29483654
OpenAlexW2794373321

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.